• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Thanks to Knuth SKA's Merging Stage 1 is 90% faster

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    apologies fungus - too much clarity from bordeaux methinks. but you're clearly not a field theorist. quite right too. waste of time.

    Comment


      #12
      The poise of the macro 11 olive and elegance of the 68000 mayfly unfortunately swamped by the rowdy rumbustiousness of the 8086 sedge.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by AtW
        Looks like whoever did that was incompetent, since you know internal detail so well I presume you were involved?
        You would have liked working at Psion. They're your kind of people. Heads so far up their arses they can see daylight.

        Originally posted by AtW
        I will report back performance improvement that I have achieved by rewriting selected functions in high-performance x86 assembly
        The excitement is unbearable ... Do please keep us posted of every exciting step.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by scotspine
          apologies fungus - too much clarity from bordeaux methinks. but you're clearly not a field theorist. quite right too. waste of time.
          I like thinking about picking mushrooms. Does that count as field theory?

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Fungus
            You would have liked working at Psion. They're your kind of people.
            Indeed - they are my kind of people, pioneers who may have ultimately failed but they played their role and will always be remembered as pioneers.

            And what you have achieved today?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by AtW
              Indeed - they are my kind of people, pioneers who may have ultimately failed but they played their role and will always be remembered as pioneers.

              And what you have achieved today?
              Those who met them will remember them as anuses.

              Did you mean to say "And what have you achieved today". Well, how kind of you to ask. I had a short work break followed by a nice lunch of baked potato, beans and bolied veg, followed by another work break and then this evening a nice Chinese takeaway. All in all very successful.

              Comment


                #17
                AtW - the Art of Computer Programming is more than one book - you have been looking at vol 3. And only a mad Russian would code these things given the large number of libraries that already do this for you.

                Comment


                  #18
                  I have all 3 volumes, most relevant for me was indeed Vol 3.

                  When you use somebody else's library (if you have this option in the first place), you just get things done but you do not gain understanding.

                  Now that I have understood and programmed some concepts I see how I can apply them in practice elsewhere and improve performance greatly.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Fungus
                    I like thinking about picking mushrooms. Does that count as field theory?
                    that'll do nicely fungus. welcome to the illustrious guild of field theorists. oh will give you your welcome pack.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      If you don't understand sorting then you have not been properly trained AtW. Implementation of a sorting algorithm is a highly skilled job - just a small error in logic can destroy an O(n log n) algorithm. That is why it is best to leave to people who have spent considerable time implementing robust algorithms in libraries.

                      I understand most sorting algorithms: quicksort, mergesort, heapsort, radix sort. Yet I ALWAYS use a library.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X