back to the dark ages

[sasguru]

What, like you have not been dribbling on about me going to the pub for the last page?

For someone who likes to think they are tough you really cannot take back what you give out.

At least the blaming of parents has a context in this discussion but then you never went to university where you are encouraged to form decisions based up on reasoning over all the facts. That's why you jump to conclusions based on hardly any evidence, it’s not your fault, you don’t know any better as you never had a tertiary education. You display all the attributes of a post office granny.

I have to disagree with you that a lack of evidence-based, data-driven reasoning is unique to the poorly educated, such as Churchy or ShaunBhoy.
Many highly educated people cannot reason to save their lives, see Melanie Philips for an example.

[Churchill]

What, like you have not been dribbling on about me going to the pub for the last page?

For someone who likes to think they are tough you really cannot take back what you give out.

At least the blaming of parents has a context in this discussion but then you never went to university where you are encouraged to form decisions based up on reasoning over all the facts. That's why you jump to conclusions based on hardly any evidence, it’s not your fault, you don’t know any better as you never had a tertiary education. You display all the attributes of a post office granny.

What? FFS grow up. I can more than take the purile tulipe you dish out.

As for jumping to conclusions, how many have you lot read the article about the "fox" attack and accepted it as gospel?

You(Minestrone) even came up with some bollocks about the fox in Edinburgh having a good old chew on a human spine - for which you have no evidence. I can only assume you were in your cups at the time and somehow confused it with the presence of the pink elephant.

[fullyautomatix]

What? FFS grow up. I can more than take the purile tulipe you dish out.

As for jumping to conclusions, how many have you lot read the article about the "fox" attack and accepted it as gospel?

You(Minestrone) even came up with some bollocks about the fox in Edinburgh having a good old chew on a human spine - for which you have no evidence. I can only assume you were in your cups at the time and somehow confused it with the presence of the pink elephant.

Foxes cannot even hunt a rabbit to survive in the wild such has been their dependence on the food scraps they can scavenge in the towns and cities. So you might have a point about the fox attack being a concoction. But I suppose they can do some medical tests and determine easily if the saliva etc came from a fox ?

Only time will tell. But there is something fishy in the story.

[sasguru]

As for jumping to conclusions, how many have you lot read the article about the "fox" attack and accepted it as gospel?

.

Well the more intelligent of us are assuming that a fox attack is a possible but rare event as the experts are telling us, that it would be hard to simulate the injuries a fox would cause even if for some reason you would want to and that the doctors in hospital are somewhat competent and would be able to detect if the injuries were other than those caused by a fox.

The less intelligent of us are spouting bollux.

HTH, but IDI.

[minestrone]

What? FFS grow up. I can more than take the purile tulipe you dish out.

As for jumping to conclusions, how many have you lot read the article about the "fox" attack and accepted it as gospel?

You(Minestrone) even came up with some bollocks about the fox in Edinburgh having a good old chew on a human spine - for which you have no evidence. I can only assume you were in your cups at the time and somehow confused it with the presence of the pink elephant.

I posted a link to a story where it said that foxes had dug up parts of a spine, I also work with many people from that area who had more detail, that is enough for me.

You started to claim it was a feckin rabbit which really just proves my point, you are not able to read and to take in the information in front of you without making up some total pish to go along with it.

[Churchill]

I posted a link to a story where it said that foxes had dug up parts of a spine, I also work with many people from that area who had more detail, that is enough for me.

You started to claim it was a feckin rabbit which really just proves my point, you are not able to read and to take in the information in front of you without making up some total pish to go along with it.

I've quoted the above for posterity.

I mentioned the rabbit theory. I gave examples and when challenged by yourself quoted a couple of academic sources.

[minestrone]

I've quoted the above for posterity.

I mentioned the rabbit theory. I gave examples and when challenged by yourself quoted a couple of academic sources.

Your example was "I seen a rabbit dig up a bottle once"

Honestly, you would get laughed out of university.

I can see why they never let you in.

[Churchill]

Your example was "I seen a rabbit dig up a bottle once"

Honestly, you would get laughed out of university.

I can see why they never let you in.

Would you like to go back, read my original post and then quote that?

[minestrone]

Would you like to go back, read my original post and then quote that?

here

I've seen a rabbit burrow where they've burrowed into an old farm's "midden" and thrown up all sorts of stuff, old glass bottles

[Churchill]

Your problem is what?

You asked for evidence and I provided some.