• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

How would a Federal UK look?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    Much the same as a split-up ex-UK. I know of no succesful federal country with such a disparity in size as there is between Scotland and England.
    Does the US count as a successful federal country?

    Alaska 1,481,346 square kilometers
    Rhode Island 2,707 square kilometers

    California 36,756,666 population
    Wyoming 532,668 population

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Scary View Post
      Does the US count as a successful federal country?

      Alaska 1,481,346 square kilometers
      Rhode Island 2,707 square kilometers

      California 36,756,666 population
      Wyoming 532,668 population
      Mea culpa, I was wrong by being imprecise. I meant to say, I have not seen a successful federal system where one of its parts is such a large part of the whole, in population, as England would be if it were a single part of a federal UK.

      Comment

      Working...
      X