• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Good for Labour

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
    Yes, it's nothing to do with the billions upon billions upon billions that Gordo's pissed away in the name of "investment" on our massively bloated public sector
    and 2 wars
    Coffee's for closers

    Comment


      #22
      The doubling of unfunded public service pension liabilty, under Brown's stewardship, is not included in the Brown Debt figures.

      Nor is the halving of private pension fund values.

      Nor are his PFI/PPI liabilities.

      Debt? We ain't seen nothing yet.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
        No, indeed. But there are some things that the Nasty Party is decisively better at.
        Yes, fiscal responsibility for one.
        ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          yes
          So you believe that the Tories will balance the books if they come to power?

          Tories haven't won in over 100 years where I live, but it might go Lib Dem at the next election if there's enough sensible voters.

          I can't see Tories getting a majority from here, to be honest, so it's a moot point (IMO).
          If you have to add a , it isn't funny. HTH. LOL.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by The Wikir Man View Post
            So you believe that the Tories will balance the books if they come to power?

            Tories haven't won in over 100 years where I live, but it might go Lib Dem at the next election if there's enough sensible voters.

            I can't see Tories getting a majority from here, to be honest, so it's a moot point (IMO).
            I can’t see labour ever doing it. Lib Dem, possibly; I think Vince Cable’s their trump card and they might just play that card if it comes to forming a coalition, which I would hope would be Lib-Con. The UK could do with some liberalism, especially on the civil liberty front.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
              They were expected to go down, but didn't. Or, propaganda from the Tories said receipts would go down, but they have been exposed as wrong.
              Lets be fair, it's hard to predict the the future.
              While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                The UK could do with some liberalism, especially on the civil liberty front.
                WHS.
                While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  I can’t see labour ever doing it. Lib Dem, possibly; I think Vince Cable’s their trump card and they might just play that card if it comes to forming a coalition, which I would hope would be Lib-Con. The UK could do with some liberalism, especially on the civil liberty front.
                  It won't be Lib-Con unless the Tories do a U-turn on spending cuts. Lib Dem have said that they wouldn't enter into a coalition with a party that is looking to cut spending in the first year (IIRC).
                  If you have to add a , it isn't funny. HTH. LOL.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by The Wikir Man View Post
                    It won't be Lib-Con unless the Tories do a U-turn on spending cuts. Lib Dem have said that they wouldn't enter into a coalition with a party that is looking to cut spending in the first year (IIRC).
                    Posturing from both sides. Reality is that if the tories are the largest party in a hung parliament, they’ll talk to the Libs and the Libs will talk too. Allowing labour back in under such circumstances could cause a pretty explosive reaction in England, where there’s likely to be a tory majority. I think they’ll be able to do a deal.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
                      Ah good. Labour may well win the election.
                      Apart from other posters debunking your theories about Labour and the economy, do we want another 4 or 5 years of these policies to grind us under the heel of the NuLabour state? A bit old but still pertinent:The Independent
                      EDIT: I note a few other contributions on this theme ahve just been posted.

                      Last edited by TinTrump; 18 March 2010, 14:52. Reason: Typing whilst cleaning teeth leads to typos

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X