• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Tories to 'reform' PAYE

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Do away with CT, and let shareholders pay the full amount of income tax on dividends.
    Then companies will pay dividends to offshore *cough* schemes *cough* so that shareholders' dividends will be out of reach.

    Personally I think CT should be the only tax - dividends should be tax free as tax was already paid.

    Comment


      #12
      Why are we (ahem, actually, you) still paying taxes? We beat Napoleon's arse centuries ago. It must have all been paid for by now.
      How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

      Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
      Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

      "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
        Why tax business accounts? In fact why tax business at all? Do away with CT, and let shareholders pay the full amount of income tax on dividends.
        I love this idea of utopia!
        I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!

        Comment


          #14
          This is all about changing people's mindset to tax. When the tax is taken at source, the tax is less visible. However, if you see a credit of your salary, then an immediate debit for the tax, it's much more evident.

          Like if you're a contractor caught under IR35, so every month you have to pay out PAYE, every quarter for VAT and every year for CT. You then realise it's your money (especially PAYE/CT) that the taxman is taking.

          I guess the idea is that people will become more demanding of tax cuts and be less squeamish about spending cuts.

          I think another idea would be to combine employers and employee's NI - but employers must increase salaries by the current level of employers NI. No-one is worse off, but the stealth tax of employers NI is there for all to see.

          Comment


            #15
            It's about the state having control of private wealth.
            How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

            Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
            Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

            "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              Tax code should be linked to NI number and money sent to NI account where deductions are made and then next amount is forwarded to employees account.

              Accountants might not like this idea.
              With errors having to be corrected via a reclaim system with all of the inevitable delays and administration costs? Not very sensible.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
                With errors having to be corrected via a reclaim system with all of the inevitable delays and administration costs? Not very sensible.
                And you can correct error with emergency tax code applied very quickly in the current system?

                I personally think it is right for all people to know that Employer is paying NIC on salaries also - that's tax on employment and in effect people pay it, so they need to know total amount of tax paid from the amount that was meant to be due to them.

                This way it should be harder for Govt to sneakly increase Employer NI.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Abolish all the other taxes, and just have a VAT hike.

                  No need for NI, CT, or anything else.

                  Every pay packet increases considerably, and thus the extra VAT on all items is no more or less affordable than before anyway. It's all relative.

                  Simples !
                  Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

                  C.S. Lewis

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
                    Abolish all the other taxes, and just have a VAT hike.
                    UK taxes by %-tage take: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_taxes.svg

                    VAT is 15% of total take, being at 17.5% level. If all other taxes are abolished then roughly speaking VAT would need to be at 105% rate: this assumes consumption will stay at this level, which it certainly won't.

                    Other than this minor issue your idea is perfectly fine!

                    What should happen is that any tax outside of top 5 main taxes (Fuel duty, Corp Tax, VAT, NI, Income tax) - 77% total take is abolished, with corresponding reduction in public expenditure by good 20% books can be balanced.
                    Last edited by AtW; 20 February 2010, 20:46.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X