Originally posted by downsouth
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Powerchex Application
Collapse
X
-
While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.' -
Incredibly, they have just asked to see a photo of the birthmark on left cheek, to make sure it's me.
Now, if I take the photo in the mirror will that confuse them?What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
MF,
this is a joke, I would be more worried of giving all of this info to a private company.
Like DP, I'd tell them to eff orf.
Milan.Comment
-
Write a letter to the HR peeps at Client Co explaining that the information PowerXXX are asking for is private and confidential but that your company warrants that all consultants provided have passed internal security checks.Comment
-
Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostIncredibly, they have just asked to see a photo of the birthmark on left cheek, to make sure it's me.
Now, if I take the photo in the mirror will that confuse them?Last edited by Contractor UK; 23 January 2015, 16:18.Comment
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostThis sort of thing is quite common in Financial Services because of FSA regulation.
It's a bulltulip line peddled by bulltulipty HR departments trying to cover their arse."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostYes, but only for "Regulated Persons" or "Regulated Positions" - not for every Tom DBA, Dick Project Manager & Harry Programmer.
It's a bulltulip line peddled by bulltulipty HR departments trying to cover their arse.Originally posted by The FSAOne of the most important controls that firms can put in place to prevent data theft and
other financial crime is a good standard of staff vetting. There have been many welldocumented
cases of staff either stealing customer data to use fraudulently or sell on to
criminals who specialise in identity fraud. Other staff have been threatened, bribed or
otherwise coerced by criminals into handing over customer data. So firms must be able
to trust that their staff will handle and use customer data securely, in line with relevant
policies and procedures
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/data_security.pdf
Like I said, there are very similar vetting procedures in place at the FSA itself, mandated by them, not the agency or outsourcing firms. It is intrusive, but probably no different than going for SC or similar.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostI have been asked to go through an additional screening application for the contract I have been offered. It's called Powerchex, it's been mentioned on here a couple of times.
It requires you to put for the last 6 years. Every job, contract, agent and role. It asks for each address, it asks for all of your education all the way back to school. Then passport number (the ridiculous long one), driving license, date of birth, maiden names, all of your ltd companies and business interests. Then copy of said passport/bills and thats before you even have to fll in a criminal check questionairre.
Been sent as a tulipty piece of paper and please fax back!
Not happy about this at all. Has anyone completed one of these and is it nothing to worry about? Not happy giving out all of this info.
Brilliant! although I'm sure its worth it for the £1000pd you're gettingCoffee's for closersComment
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostThe next paragraph mentions IT staff specifically. Few people have more access to sensitive customer data than DBAs and other IT support staff.
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/data_security.pdf
Like I said, there are very similar vetting procedures in place at the FSA itself, mandated by them, not the agency or outsourcing firms. It is intrusive, but probably no different than going for SC or similar.
If the FSA move to make everybody who works in a bank a regulated person then they are muppets."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
Brilliant! although I'm sure its worth it for the £1000pd you're getting
I didnt get that contract. I F ff Fffff failed the interview.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Yesterday 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 14 15:46
- What the housing market needs at Autumn Budget 2025 Sep 10 20:58
- Qdos hit by cybersecurity ‘attack’ Sep 10 01:01
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Sep 9 09:53
Comment