Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
It is, but although the Niqab is a part of Islam, it is not a requirement. It is a cultural choice.
Errm, not quite. You won't find many Sikhs in Britain visibly wearing a sharpened blade. They tend to accept they are defended by the state and so the discrete wearing of a blunt knife (effectively ceremonial) is sufficient to represent their faith.
It is just as illegal for a Sikh to go wandering around with a sword as it is for you and I; they do not have an exemption in British law. Edit: yes they do, but they should not be wandering around with massive knives on their belts. If they are that is personal choice, not a religious requirement.
And in general, don't have a go at the Sikhs. They should not be bundled in with the general purpose "paki-bashing" or anti-Moslem blind racist hatreds.
Edit: those Sikhs who do carry a sharpened blade publicly are being a pain in the arse for the hell of it.
Edit edit: I have changed this post so many times in light of subsequence Googling that I am tempted to delete it. I had not realised that over the years the Kirpan has been referenced explicitly many times in British legislation. As I understood the law in the early 1980s, there was no necessity for such an exemption and the British Sikh community had come to a compromise that meant they conformed with the law at the time. That is, that anyone with a good reason could discretely carry a sheathed knife up to 5" in length (e.g. going fishing, Scouts going to camp, catching rabbits, etc.). Having made this explicit exemption for religious reasons, we may as well allow everything for everyone else too.
Funny enough, I used to go around with about a thousand other guys weilding razor sharp weapons and enough firearms to give AtW a bonio,
we used to fight vicious Civil war battles, for the public (and our own) entertainment. The plod used to come around now and then, nod wisely then beat a hasty
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work
It is, but although the Niqab is a part of Islam, it is not a requirement. It is a cultural choice.
And in general, don't have a go at the Sikhs. They should not be bundled in with the general purpose "paki-bashing" or anti-Moslem blind racist hatreds.
1) That's my point. If I were a Jedi and wanted to wander around with a hood on which completely covered my face (expressing my religious belief) then under this "law" I'd be allowed, but Mrs Muslim across the road couldn't do the same.
2) I'm not having a go a Sikhs, I'm drawing a parallel between things that are optional being allowed. Perhaps I should have gone with the Jedi first.
"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."
The French haven't banned burkas, or indeed niqabs - all the story says is that a law has been proposed (by one politician), and said "draft law" hasn't even been filed in the National Assembly yet.
Yes external signs of religions are banned at schools in France. This is to make sure the laicity is preserved in public schools.
However, if you want to give your kids a religious education you can too. Just send them to a religious school.
Imams too are being under control. They are not allowed to talk in bad about France and must respect the laws and love France. If they preach hate Islam, they are silenced. This not only helps preventing spreading hate in some cases, and helps Islam get on with Republican laws.
This aims to prevent communautarism spread and divide people into ghettos or communities. In France you have to be French first, then what you want.
Being French first means you will respect others through laicity and in your private sphere, you are free to be a Christian a Muslim or a Jew...
Comment