A lot of the young lads around here do this exact thing for a living. They also do a lot of other dubious and illegal things. Just to have a Beemer, a Rolex and bling whilst still living in the slum and showing it off to the pals who make a honest living.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
'Crash for cash' scam man jailed
Collapse
X
-
McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error." -
Isn't this just the start of the scam though?
I thought the real money making part is the overpriced repair quotes they get from their mates' garages, and the made-up whiplash claims. Insurance companies should wise up to the former and stop paying out for the latter.Cats are evil.Comment
-
The story on the BBC made me LOL, chummy's MO was so streamlined he even wore the same clothes each time, eww.Originally posted by swamp View PostIsn't this just the start of the scam though?
I thought the real money making part is the overpriced repair quotes they get from their mates' garages, and the made-up whiplash claims. Insurance companies should wise up to the former and stop paying out for the latter.
Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
Why is it their fault depending on the type of animal. They've seen an obstruction in the road ahead and execute an emergency stop - as they must surely be entitled to do. If you are paying attention and maintain a safe distance and speed, you'll never hit them, no matter where/when/how hard they brake.Originally posted by threaded View PostIf they braked for a licensed animal, i.e. a dog, a cow, etc., then it is your fault if you rear end them. If they brake for a cat, or a squirrel, etc. then it is their fault.
Of couse, most people travel much closer than the recommended 2 second gap and spends most of their journey on virtual autopilot daydreaming, but that's still their fault.Comment
-
You are allowed to brake suddenly for a licensed animal, you're not for a cat, for example.Originally posted by centurian View PostWhy is it their fault depending on the type of animal. If you are paying attention and maintain a safe distance and speed, you'll never hit them, no matter where/when/how hard they brake.
Of couse, most people travel much closer than the recommended 2 second gap and spends most of their journey on virtual autopilot daydreaming, but that's still their fault.
I don't make the rules, they are what they are.
HTHInsanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
I hate that rule from personal experience, and I do wonder how many of these scammers would be caught if it was just questioned from time to time. The only crash I've ever had involved the roundabout scenario, though I don't think the guy was a scammer, just a really dodgy driver. He pulled on to the roundabout and I followed him, checking traffic to my right as I did so ...and then he stopped, for no reason at all. A cop car happened to come along and I tried to flag them down as witnesses but they just gave me a filthy look and drove on.Originally posted by centurian View PostI thought that if you go into the back of someone, it is always your fault.
The argument being that either you were travelling too close, too fast, or not paying sufficient attention. The person in front has the right to brake suddenly and drivers should always allow for this.
The "you-drove-into-them-so-it's-your-fault" rule was completely incontestable. My own insurers had absolutely no interest in my point of view. They certainly never asked, "Do you think it might have been a scammer?" Coincidentally, my incident happened about 4 miles down the road from this guy in the news, but it was an old geezer driving the car I hit. Maybe it was his dad.
Comment
-
It is a very old scam. I've known about it since my first driving experiences in a nice car. I've developed a sixth sense for it now. But particularly English, not noticed it so much in other countries.Originally posted by dang65 View PostMaybe it was ...
Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
Where does it say that you are not allowed to brake suddenly for an obstruction in the road. What about a large deer - they're wild and not licensed.Originally posted by threaded View PostYou are allowed to brake suddenly for a licensed animal, you're not for a cat, for example.
I don't make the rules, they are what they are.
Not saying you're wrong, just that there are a lot of myths and urban legends and trying to sort out the fact from fiction.Comment
-
Yes, which makes me wonder how many other scammers are out there - that actually have a few more brain cells and have gone undetected for years.Originally posted by threaded View PostThe story on the BBC made me LOL, chummy's MO was so streamlined he even wore the same clothes each time, eww.
Comment
-
Road Traffic Act 1988: “animal” means horse, cattle, ass, mule, sheep, pig, goat or dog.Originally posted by centurian View PostWhere does it say that you are not allowed to brake suddenly for an obstruction in the road. What about a large deer - they're wild and not licensed.
Not saying you're wrong, just that there are a lot of myths and urban legends and trying to sort out the fact from fiction.
Are deer cattle? I think they are.
Anyways, you don't stop for cats, or squirrels, or leaves blowing in the wind.
HTHInsanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Today 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Yesterday 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42

Comment