It's yet another method of draining money from private individuals into Government Inc. This cash will allow Government Inc. to employ more people to carry out the checks (jobs that contribute nothing to the economy). These people will owe thier jobs to NuLab policy so will, presumably, vote for NuLab.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Guilty until proven innocent
Collapse
X
-
-
£64 cost for each check, with nearly 11 million check
£650 million quids for the govt
every little helpsComment
-
1) If it's a job requirement, why is she paying it?
It's an EB requirement. She's self-employed.
2) Vince has been ok in my dealings with him.
Not so with us. Depends upon the issue I guess. This is certainly out of his control, but he could respond, at the very least.
3) isn't a single agency what is being implemented here?
The current requirements are separate checks for different societies, clubs, organisations and EBs. They may be processed through the same agency, but unless they change the rules, you'd still have to request (and pay for) separate CRB checks for, say, being a scout leader, and driving kids to clubs unrelated to scouting.Comment
-
Originally posted by Andy2 View Post£64 cost for each check, with nearly 11 million check
£650 million quids for the govt
every little helps
Registration will cost £64 in England and Wales, but unpaid volunteers will be exempt from the charge.
I think we can expect more of this kind of 1984-esque legislation in the final 'Downfall' days of New Labour.
Scorched earth and all that.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Comment