• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Ohh... that's interesting - UK trials without juries

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Clarkson wrote an article on this. He makes the point that a jury isn't exactly a great system - if we as educated types would often be biased anytime we see a chavy type on trial, it's a frightening thought having Joe Public decide your fate.
    I couldn't agree more actually - although a jury system works great on paper, they're so heavily steered by the judge anyway, it's a bit of a farce.

    They need something a little more in the middle - a mixed panel of educated laypeople with legal professionals maybe.

    Or I'd settle for a whole jury of educated lay people with no interfierance from the judge.

    I guess the key point here is educated laypeople - most of the brain dead fu*kwits in this country are not my peers thanks.
    The pope is a tard.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
      I couldn't agree more actually - although a jury system works great on paper, they're so heavily steered by the judge anyway, it's a bit of a farce.

      They need something a little more in the middle - a mixed panel of educated laypeople with legal professionals maybe.

      Or I'd settle for a whole jury of educated lay people with no interfierance from the judge.

      I guess the key point here is educated laypeople - most of the brain dead fu*kwits in this <part of the> country are not my peers thanks.
      Yeah, I've been to Sunderland and Newcastle...

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
        I guess the key point here is educated laypeople - most of the brain dead fu*kwits in this country are not my peers thanks.
        Well said, I think I would object and press the "jury of my peers" option. Oddly, I think I would trust must of the CUKers to be fair.

        Alternatively I would like to see us scrap the adversarial legal system we have. A clever lawyer can get a guilty person off by manipulating the system or intimidating a witness to best represent their client.
        I would rather we had legal councils charged with representing the law who would come to a decision based on the evidence and interviews with all the witnesses.
        I am not qualified to give the above advice!

        The original point and click interface by
        Smith and Wesson.

        Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

        Comment


          #14
          I have witnesses thrown out of public trials before. During commital proceedings which is illegal.

          Comment

          Working...
          X