Energy cannot be destroyed or created. HTH
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Neat and designed in the UK
Collapse
X
-
-
Energy certainly can be created: from matter.Originally posted by Amiga500 View PostEnergy cannot be destroyed or created. HTH
I think some old duffer called Albert had an equation to work out just how much energy you could create for a given amount of matter.
HTH
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
The law of conservation of energy states that the total amount of energy in an isolated system remains constant. A consequence of this law is that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. The only thing that can happen with energy in an isolated system is that it can change form, for instance kinetic energy can become thermal energy. Because energy is associated with mass in the Einstein's theory of relativity, the conservation of energy also implies the conservation of mass in isolated systems (that is, the mass of a system cannot change, so long as energy is not permitted to enter or leave the system).Originally posted by bogeyman View PostEnergy certainly can be created: from matter.
I think some old duffer called Albert had an equation to work out just how much energy you could create for a given amount of matter.
HTH
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
HTHYou can lead a fool to wisdom but you can't make him think.Comment
-
Oh another Wiki Warrior. Just what we need.Originally posted by Amiga500 View PostThe law of conservation of energy states that the total amount of energy in an isolated system remains constant. A consequence of this law is that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. The only thing that can happen with energy in an isolated system is that it can change form, for instance kinetic energy can become thermal energy. Because energy is associated with mass in the Einstein's theory of relativity, the conservation of energy also implies the conservation of mass in isolated systems (that is, the mass of a system cannot change, so long as energy is not permitted to enter or leave the system).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
HTH
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Ok, how about Brittanica:Originally posted by bogeyman View PostOh another Wiki Warrior. Just what we need.
The first two laws of thermodynamics state, in essence, that energy can be neither created nor destroyed and that the effect of physical and chemical changes is to increase the disorder, or randomness (i.e., entropy), of the universe.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/...ergy-exchanges
HTHYou can lead a fool to wisdom but you can't make him think.Comment
-
Originally posted by threaded View PostYes, you are correct. Ignore most of these donkeys as they've not got a clue what they're on with and just bulltulip their way through life.
.

Pot, kettle statement of the decade if not the century.

Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Are you capable of addressing any question using your own knowledge and experience, or do you have to look everything up using online references?Originally posted by Amiga500 View PostOk, how about Brittanica:
The first two laws of thermodynamics state, in essence, that energy can be neither created nor destroyed and that the effect of physical and chemical changes is to increase the disorder, or randomness (i.e., entropy), of the universe.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/...ergy-exchanges
HTH
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
To be fair, I think he was being ironic (or possibly goldy).Originally posted by sasguru View Post

Pot, kettle statement of the decade if not the century.


You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
My original answer was from my own knowledge, I was showing you your response was wrong by pointing you to literature.Originally posted by bogeyman View PostAre you capable of addressing any question using your own knowledge and experience, or do you have to look everything up using online references?
HTHYou can lead a fool to wisdom but you can't make him think.Comment
-
The average doughnut has more (potential) energy than a stick of dynamite. Burns a bit slower though.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment