• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Missing plane

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    The plane was an Air France owned fairly new A330.

    It left radar contact off the NE coast of Brazil as normal, it failed to make contact again with air traffic control when it should have reached the north west African coast

    The plane has definately gone down as it should have ran out of fuel 1hr ago

    The A330 model plane has only had 2 crashes in the last 20 years
    The proud owner of 125 Xeno Geek Points

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
      Although most major operators of 4 engined jets have implemented ETOPS for North Atlantic routes.
      I thought (wrongly?) part of the deal to get north atlantic certification on twins was that operators would move towards ETOPS with new deliveries (i.e. post about '84). Also I though it was only the North Atlantic where ETOPS had to apply - subject to individual operators getting certified and monitored, because it is not only operating procedure but also airframe certification.

      I didn't think these south american routes were ETOPS - though there are obviously assorted standards and these differ for each carrie aircraft combination.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by zeitghost
        That's all very well for the model, how has the full size one done?
        I've flown a few model planes, if you don't crash a few you're not pushing yourself hard enough.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcuHOU0VnC8 about 40 seconds in... $20,000 up in smoke.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFKa2sLUv34&NR=1 about 1 minute in, the guy looks like he just lost a family member.
        Last edited by gingerjedi; 1 June 2009, 12:32.
        Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
          I've flown a few model planes, if you don't crash a few you're not pushing yourself hard enough.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcuHOU0VnC8 about 40 seconds in... $20,000 up in smoke.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFKa2sLUv34&NR=1 about 1 minute in, the guy looks like he just lost a family member.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52CVr...eature=related

          RC Concorde.

          Cool.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
            Giants playing with the real thing shirley?
            Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

            Comment


              #26
              Saying on the news they think it was a Lighting Strike!
              Just call me Matron - Too many handbags

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by zara_backdog View Post
                Saying on the news they think it was a Lighting Strike!
                Bloody Unions.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                  Bloody Unions.

                  Bloody French unions.
                  Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                    Utter bollux.
                    According to that logic, once any plane, from whatever carrier, touches down in a certain country, they have abdicated responsibility to that country?

                    You are CyberTwunt's long lost twin and I claim my 5 dunces hats.
                    You, sir, are a twunt.

                    No-one is suggesting abdication of responsibility, merely that standards of work in airports in some countries differ significantly from others.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by zara_backdog View Post
                      Saying on the news they think it was a Lighting Strike!
                      Interesting IIRC the last total loss of a large airliner from a lightning strike was a 707 in about 1967

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X