• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The snot goblin says "Sorry"

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    just for the sake of balance, I will quote Tory Alan Duncan, who said “every MP must apologise for what has arisen over time”.

    No Alan, it didn't "arise over time". You did it.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by expat View Post
      I think that we, their employers, should pay every last penny of the cost of their London houses. Then when they leave parliament, we keep the house. And the bathroom fittings and all.
      It'd be a way of ensuring that the tax take could be reduced (very) slightly!

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by expat View Post
        Hazel Blears is the worst, with her egregious claims, a simple defence that it is all within the rules, and then a brazen attempt to portray herself as someone rushing to the rescue to change the system.
        <Rant>
        This didn't surprise me one bit, Hazel blears oozes smugness and impertinence. Quoting her from a weekly Question Time earlier this year on the recession / banking crisis, she asked the unhappy audience "Who can't say they didn't have a good time over the last 10 years?". As if it was 'Ok' that we are all now in a hideous recession, the worst since the 1930's, because we had all lived it up over the last 10 years riding the boom. Whilst correct that times have been (abnormally) good, it is completley immoral to imply that this recession was somehow just a minor inconvenience, worth taking the hit, or that we're just ungrateful etc. The UK doesn't need people like this in government office.
        </Rant>

        On a note more related this this thread, why does the independent expenses audit have to cost so much?

        "The new body would be entirely independent and cost about £600,000 a year to run"

        I'll do it for £100k

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
          Shut up and pay your fair share of tax.
          It's only fair. Hazel Blears can have one principal residence for tax purposes but a different one for expenses purposes. Likewise we can be employees for tax purposes but not for benefits purposes.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
            On a note more related this this thread, why does the independent expenses audit have to cost so much?

            "The new body would be entirely independent and cost about £600,000 a year to run"

            I'll do it for £100k
            I wouldn't. To manage the expenses for 600+ MPs plus the same again in the Lords I'd want:

            6 clerical staff at about £18k = £108k
            1 filing clerk at about £14k = £14k
            one HEO to manage them = £35k
            one accountancy-qualified HEO = £38k
            one SEO to manage the HEOs = £42k

            total £237k. Then add employer's NI and stuff, call it £260.

            Then add a Senior Civil Servant (salary confidential) as section head at, say, £110k
            Then a Chief Executive for the Expenses Agency - another a Senior Civil Servant (salary confidential) - at, say, £180k including their annual bonus.

            That's about £527k

            Then there's £100k for the management consultancy and another £300k for EDS.

            It simply cannot be done for less than £1m per year.
            Drivelling in TPD is not a mental health issue. We're just community blogging, that's all.

            Xenophon said: "CUK Geek of the Week". A gingerjedi certified "Elitist Tw@t". Posting rated @ 5 lard points

            Comment


              #16
              Hazel Blears had three 'second' homes in one year in order to exploit expenses on them and to sell them on for a profit after refurbishment. She must be made to repay the funds that she embezzled and serve a prison sentence.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by expat View Post
                just for the sake of balance, I will quote Tory Alan Duncan, who said “every MP must apologise for what has arisen over time”.

                No Alan, it didn't "arise over time". You did it.

                Repay the money that you stole Alan. I have written to your boss on this subject yesterday.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by BrowneIssue View Post
                  I wouldn't. To manage the expenses for 600+ MPs plus the same again in the Lords I'd want:

                  6 clerical staff at about £18k = £108k
                  1 filing clerk at about £14k = £14k
                  one HEO to manage them = £35k
                  one accountancy-qualified HEO = £38k
                  one SEO to manage the HEOs = £42k

                  total £237k. Then add employer's NI and stuff, call it £260.

                  Then add a Senior Civil Servant (salary confidential) as section head at, say, £110k
                  Then a Chief Executive for the Expenses Agency - another a Senior Civil Servant (salary confidential) - at, say, £180k including their annual bonus.

                  That's about £527k

                  Then there's £100k for the management consultancy and another £300k for EDS.

                  It simply cannot be done for less than £1m per year.
                  Or they could employ me for much less and I'll sit there saying no and recording a big fat zero in my excel spreadsheet.
                  Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

                  I preferred version 1!

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
                    Or they could employ me for much less and I'll sit there saying no and recording a big fat zero in my excel spreadsheet.
                    They have a .... sitting there called Malcolm Jack that says YES and gets to live in a posh pad for his trouble.
                    How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

                    Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
                    Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

                    "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X