Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Am I the only one opposed to an automatic right of all Ghurkas to retire here?
"They fought for our country etc." Actually, they got paid for a job they chose to do because by the standards of Nepal it provided a darn good living. Now, although some have served for as little as fifteen years, they are to receive the same NHS care and state pension in old age as British soldiers although most of the money they received did not stay in Britain to stimulate our economy but went to Nepal. In all that large number I am betting there are going to be some undesirables, criminals etc and it is right to treat this on a case by case basis.
The arrangement is an anachronism that should be ended. Pay British troops.
Clearly, you don't know the first thing about the gurkhas or their history.
"I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
The Indians and Pakistanis (and the rest of the empire) fought for us during WW2 so should we let all of them in as well?
I think you should be grateful that them and the Chinese (alongside with other nations) did not ask UK to repay years of occupation and plundering of their own land - opium wars alone would probably qualify as war crime now.
Comment