Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I think we have to ask for a point of evidence on that.
Expected this year in a rubbish market:
"In those six months, Java accounted for $101m in billings" Source
I know I said profit but $200m in a year on billings should make you a profit for just software. And I am sure if you looked at last years earnings report it did in fact say around £200m profit.
Expected this year in a rubbish market:
"In those six months, Java accounted for $101m in billings" Source
I know I said profit but $200m in a year on billings should make you a profit for just software. And I am sure if you looked at last years earnings report it did in fact say around £200m profit.
JAVA does make money.
I expect this is going to down to sematics, I agree they have made a few coppers off me doing my certifications, they make a good bit from training but from actual java it is a loss leader. $101 is the turnover of a football club, it is not a revenue stream that can support a company the size of SUN.
I think SUN are a great company, java is the best language to develop in, glassfish is massively better than websphere, weblogic, jboss or oracle's AS. Netbeans is a mile ahead of eclipse which is industry standard. Yet I work in RAD.
I am glad that oracle got them infront of IBM, IBM got to develop much of java in the early days and their parts of the JDK stink.
Me either. Seems like a lot of money to splash out. They paid about a 40% premium. Still it gives oracle access to a fantastic customer base I guess.
Most of whom were customers already - I've rarely seen a SUN machine not running an Oracle database.
As for mySQL accounting for "95%" of the databases in the world, I think not. Their own site is even a bit vague about the figures (referring to percentages of developers who use it). Nevertheless I'm impressed as I didn't realise it had such takeup.
Comment