Originally posted by centurian
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The rotting stench of downing street
Collapse
X
-
-
Jacqui Smith is trying to bring in some absurd new law that would place on men using prostitutes the burden of proof that these women hadn't been trafficked.Originally posted by centurian View Post.. c) Jackie Smith claiming expenses clearly unrelated to her work as an MP (porno films).
In other words the punters would be presumed guilty and would have to prove their innocence.
It struck me the other day. Trafficked women also get roped into acting in porn films don't they? So shouldn't the home secretary and her husband be arrested and held in custody until we can be sure none of the women in the porn they were watching (at our expense!) had not been trafficked? Better safe than sorry.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
And definately held "under anti-Terrorism legislation". After all, don't get keep getting told that the proceeds of crime go to fund terrorist activitiesOriginally posted by OwlHoot View PostJacqui Smith is trying to bring in some absurd new law that would place on men using prostitutes the burden of proof that these women hadn't been trafficked.
In other words the punters would be presumed guilty and would have to prove their innocence.
It struck me the other day. Trafficked women also get roped into acting in porn films don't they? So shouldn't the home secretary and her husband be arrested and held in custody until we can be sure none of the women in the porn they were watching (at our expense!) had not been trafficked? Better safe than sorry.Comment
-
She is a stupid cow isn't she.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostJacqui Smith is trying to bring in some absurd new law that would place on men using prostitutes the burden of proof that these women hadn't been trafficked.Comment
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostAt least none of their MPs have been found dead after auto erotic asphyxiation dressed in stockings. Crap and delusional maybe but depravity is a Tory specialty.
I'm now tempted to believe that it was a set-up by Labour !!
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36


Comment