Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Although I would have accepted the line that it was an exercise that went wrong, there is one thing that makes me doubt it. Would you use two subs of the same class i.e. ballistic missile? If it was a hide/seek exercise, a very valid thing to do, surely it would be of two different classes?
How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
They should hang old tractor tyres off the sides, tied on with old rope, so they sort of bounce off each other. Thats what I would do if I was an admiral
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work
They should hang old tractor tyres off the sides, tied on with old rope, so they sort of bounce off each other. Thats what I would do if I was an admiral
Good idea. I'd also reintroduce crow's nests. They always used to spot each other in those days. Obviously being a submarine the man in it would have to be dressed up as a frogman.
Good idea. I'd also reintroduce crow's nests. They always used to spot each other in those days. Obviously being a submarine the man in it would have to be dressed up as a frogman.
You can't be serious. Dont you relise that it was crashing INTO a frogman that caused all the fuss in the first place
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work
Comment