How long before we cannot refer to black people as black? I can see it coming.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
True colours
Collapse
X
-
-
I've been down that road...I've always used the term "black" and was reprimanded by "white" friends of mine for being racist. So I asked other "black" friends and collegues what would be the correct term. All, without hestitation said that they hate the PC bulltulipe and had no problems with being called black.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostHow long before we cannot refer to black people as black? I can see it coming.Gas masks don't fit snails...
Comment
-
Already. When I lived in France, a colleague of my wife, an African Frenchwoman, was going on a business trip to the US. She was asked to describe her appearance for the person who might meet her there, to help in recognition. She described herself as female, (age), (height), and black. The Americans said "you can't say that". What? she asked. "That you're black". But I am, she replied in incomprehension.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostHow long before we cannot refer to black people as black? I can see it coming.
I call that PC gone too far, originating perhaps from a well-intentioned idea that ethnic origin and in particular skin colour have no acceptable relevance to the work environment and so must not be mentioned; but gone too far because the point was physical appearance (of which, after all, no part should be taken into account in the workplace; but all of which might be relevant to visual recognition).Comment
-
We used to say "coloured", as if it was in some way milder than "black". Black people themselves proudly replaced it by "black", correctly figuring that their skin colour is simply what it is, not something to be euphemistic about.Originally posted by dwm009 View PostI've been down that road...I've always used the term "black" and was reprimanded by "white" friends of mine for being racist. So I asked other "black" friends and collegues what would be the correct term. All, without hestitation said that they hate the PC bulltulipe and had no problems with being called black.Comment
-
Those are the social anxiety ridden idiots I was talking about, I work with a 6 foot tall black guy whose built like a brick tulip house and it amazes me when people try to describe him as the guy with the green jumper or some such like, his most distinguishable feature is the fact he's a big black guy, why can't you just say it FFS??... he really doesn't mind.Originally posted by dwm009 View PostI've been down that road...I've always used the term "black" and was reprimanded by "white" friends of mine for being racist. So I asked other "black" friends and collegues what would be the correct term. All, without hestitation said that they hate the PC bulltulipe and had no problems with being called black.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
On another tangent, let's pre-suppose that a man in the street saw a black man, and thought to himself "Oh it's a N*****".
If the man went to the police, and said "I was walking down the street, saw a black man, and thought ""Oh it's a N*****", could they arrest him ?
I suppose not, until the point when he shares his thoughts with another, in which case he could get arrested.
Talking of words, the word "Cripple" is seen by some to have negative connotations. If you ask me, the only negative is the condition itself. The word is unimportant.
Several of my friends have medical conditions, ranging from ME, MS (myself), Spina Bifida, and one whose has a wasting disease in the knees (I cannot recall the name).
The 4 of us are all goths and see each other regularly, and we are proud of our medical allegiance to our self-styled "Cripps Club". We even have plastic laminated cards. We casually toss the word "Crip" or "Cripple" around all the time. Not to offend others. But to prove a point.
The point being that, we ourselves call each other a name that some people might find offensive, to demonstrate to others that the name is not offensive. If it was, we'd be offended wouldn't we ? Hence we use it in common parlance. It really doesn't bother us, but then again, us 4 tend to go against the grain on most things because that's the way. We certainly don't want any PC-Brigade representing us or mothering us or telling others to tip-toe around us.Last edited by Board Game Geek; 5 February 2009, 16:40.Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
The point being that, we ourselves call each other a name that some people might find offensive, to demonstrate to others that the name is not offensive. If it was, we'd be offended wouldn't we ? Hence we use it in common parlance. It really doesn't bother us, but then again, us 4 tend to go against the grain on most things because that's the way. We certainly don't want any PC-Brigade representing us or mothering us or telling others to tip-toe around us.
Quite a bit of modern day comedy uses openly offensive language or situations (Little Britain love it or loath it) but it's used in an ironic sense so it's really mocking the social anxiety rather than the subject.
A mate of mine bought his 3 year old daughter a big portable stereo a few weeks back and referred to it as "her first *** box" which would be completely unacceptable amongst strangers, in reality he was just mocking the people who would say that sort of thing in a public situation without batting an eye lid, we both knew that so it was funny.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
I completely agree. I mentioned to the same friends, that I was on the tube once and overheard an Indian chap talking to a white chap about a girl. The Indian chap said the white chap shouldn't get involved with her because "she's a paki, like me, and paki chicks are hard work".Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostOn another tangent, let's pre-suppose that a man in the street saw a black man, and thought to himself "Oh it's a N*****".
If the man went to the police, and said "I was walking down the street, saw a black man, and thought ""Oh it's a N*****", could they arrest him ?
My friends think it was perfectly acceptable for him to use the term "paki".
So political correctness is "one rule for some, a different rule for others?", I asked. "Yes!" was their answer!

Needless to say, I don't spend much time in their company anymore.Gas masks don't fit snails...
Comment
-
Well, it used to be IC3, but in these politically correct times it is now EC3.
HTH
Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
IC1 is now 'Whisky Tango'Originally posted by threaded View PostWell, it used to be IC3, but in these politically correct times it is now EC3.
HTH

HTH
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Today 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Yesterday 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22

Comment