Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
What happened to the future?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
-
It seems I’ve touched a nerve with this thread. It’s something I care passionately about, and it looks like other techies do too. I’m convinced that mankind is living way below our potential for technological advance. I’m not convinced by arguments of weighing economics versus environment; technology can show us the way to make our lives better, improve our environment and make money doing so, but it needs some vision and the kind of investor who doesn’t demand returns in three months, but over 30 years. Perhaps some of the financial ‘experts’ who’ve lost their jobs can develop financial instruments that are more suited to developing future technologies.
Perhaps also now that governments are throwing huge amounts of borrowed money around, they should stop spending to rescue failed businesses of the past, and divert the money to the infrastructure and industries of the future. That’s surely what borrowing is for; to raise capital to finance an investment which provides long term utility.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostIt seems I’ve touched a nerve with this thread. It’s something I care passionately about, and it looks like other techies do too. I’m convinced that mankind is living way below our potential for technological advance. I’m not convinced by arguments of weighing economics versus environment; technology can show us the way to make our lives better, improve our environment and make money doing so, but it needs some vision and the kind of investor who doesn’t demand returns in three months, but over 30 years. Perhaps some of the financial ‘experts’ who’ve lost their jobs can develop financial instruments that are more suited to developing future technologies.
Perhaps also now that governments are throwing huge amounts of borrowed money around, they should stop spending to rescue failed businesses of the past, and divert the money to the infrastructure and industries of the future. That’s surely what borrowing is for; to raise capital to finance an investment which provides long term utility.
Well put
This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernamesComment
-
But that doesnt' exactly benefit the here and now does it ?That’s surely what borrowing is for; to raise capital to finance an investment which provides long term utility.
I mean, you stump up x amount of cash, and in 30 years time, it might provide you with a new income stream.
You might be dead in 30 years time, or not in a state to enjoy the fruits of your lending.
And in 30 years time, if you are still around, and the project is a failure, you're probably going to be too old to take advantage of anything else...so you are fubared because of long termism.Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostPerhaps also now that governments are throwing huge amounts of borrowed money around, they should stop spending to rescue failed businesses of the past, and divert the money to the infrastructure and industries of the future. That’s surely what borrowing is for; to raise capital to finance an investment which provides long term utility.
We need a Monorail
Last edited by gingerjedi; 22 January 2009, 17:10.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
And if you don't, it certainly won't.Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostBut that doesnt' exactly benefit the here and now does it ?
I mean, you stump up x amount of cash, and in 30 years time, it might provide you with a new income stream.Comment
-
Agreed, which is why short-term investments, and several of them, are more popular with speculators.And if you don't, it certainly won't.Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
Agreed - also investment should be across a range of projects - not just one, that way if some succeed it doesn't matter if the others do not.Originally posted by expat View PostAnd if you don't, it certainly won't.
And, as I am fond of saying to my clients: "Anything is possible, how much do you want to spend?"This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernamesComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Today 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Yesterday 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57


Comment