• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

If the Tories had been in power things would probably be worse

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    If, as is commonly believed, this recession/depression has been caused by

    (1) the securitisation of sub-prime mortgages by financial firms combined with
    (2) an overly lax monetary policy i.e. too low interest rates

    then logically as the Tories traditionally support more deregulation and lower interest rates, we would have been no better under them and arguably worse.

    I now await the hard of thinking, reflex, cretinous Tories on this forum, but I would ask them to address the logic of this post rather than behave like chimps prodded in a laboratory.
    He who ignores history is destined never to learn from it. All but the most hard of thinking, reflex, cretinous socialists in this country must accept after the best part of a century that the Labour party's incompetence with public money and fiscal policy knows no bounds, never has, and never will.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
      He who ignores history is destined never to learn from it. All but the most hard of thinking, reflex, cretinous socialists in this country must accept after the best part of a century that the Labour party's incompetence with public money and fiscal policy knows no bounds, never has, and never will.
      Come on now, stop beating about the bush
      Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
        Come on now, stop beating about the bush
        The cretinous bit was only paraphrasing the original questioner.

        But the essence is true...

        Comment


          #44
          5 pages and no bite from Cybertory??

          Is he banned?
          Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

          Comment


            #45
            No, I have just logged back on after a break from the boards.

            The Tories would not have been so bad because:

            1) Taxes, borrowing and spending would not be out of control. Labour always spend more than can be afforded and that is a recipe for disaster. The Tories have a reputation for much better housekeeping and less public sector spending. Labour are now throwing money at the banks like there is no tomorrow. The Tories would never have cut VAT to 15% and wasted 12 Billion pounds.

            2) Public sector pensions are out of control and this is also adversely affecting spending and borrowing

            3) Brown split the regulator into FSA and the BofE so both sides did not know whose responsibility was what. This has been the cause of much of the bank sector problems by the failure of regulation.

            4) Brown gave the BofE independence on rate control, which was great while we had a boom, but this caused a delay of about a year in cutting interest rates and thus again has contributed majorly to the current recession.

            5) Immigration is out of control and thus unemployment will end up much higher than it would have. The Tories would not have allowed the Poles in seven years before we had to.

            6) HIPS have adversely affected the housing market and would never have been invented under the Tories.


            ..... and I could add a lot more

            Comment


              #46
              I think I covered all that in my short but simple history lesson. If you must go into details, the three worst mistakes of the current lot are:

              1. Buggering up bank regulators (which you mentioned)

              2. Grossly expanding our public servant pension commitments while at the same time slashing our private pension funds

              3. Losing control of immigration

              In my humble opinion of course.

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
                I think I covered all that in my short but simple history lesson. If you must go into details, the three worst mistakes of the current lot are:

                1. Buggering up bank regulators (which you mentioned)

                2. Grossly expanding our public servant pension commitments while at the same time slashing our private pension funds

                3. Losing control of immigration

                In my humble opinion of course.
                Erm, killing off civil liberties, following Mr Bush to Iraq, spending years negotiating with the IRA and still failing to get rid of Northern Ireland, we could make this a very long list, although it wouldn’t surprise me if the other lot would have done these things.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Erm, killing off civil liberties, following Mr Bush to Iraq, spending years negotiating with the IRA and still failing to get rid of Northern Ireland, we could make this a very long list, although it wouldn’t surprise me if the other lot would have done these things.
                  Well they seemed very quiet in opposition, except for the time when they gave Blair a standing ovation, so I regard them as being accessories to all that happened. At the very least, they failed in opposition.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                    Well they seemed very quiet in opposition, except for the time when they gave Blair a standing ovation, so I regard them as being accessories to all that happened. At the very least, they failed in opposition.
                    So it wasn't the left wing controlled media selectively showing Nu Lab in a good light and cutting the opposition out then?

                    Comment


                      #50


                      Originally posted by FSM with Cheddar View Post
                      Yeah fair point, I was pleased when Labour came to power. The Conservatives needed a good kick up the proverbial.

                      But now it is the same with labour; even if the Tories wouldn't have handled this much better. They are now an effective opposition, and are developing policies which are realistic, and in touch with the public. So I would be far more confident with a Tory government after the next election.
                      They were for far too long an ineffective opposition.
                      Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X