Originally posted by foritisme
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Doomed
Collapse
X
-
I would say a quite different situation indeed. Even the Americans would be far better off if the City had been regulated by people with a clue rather than political placemen. Even with all the deregulation just the lightest touch by the clued up would have averted much of what has happend. -
-
Stick to voting for Brown. He's the sort of person that best represents your intellect.Originally posted by foritisme View PostSo the City would be more regulated with less red tape ??Comment
-
Most of the red tape is just there to give jobs to the boys. In financial services much of it is just pointless cut'n'paste, why not just refer to standard paragraphs and regulations taking at most a couple of lines, rather than copy them verbatim and fill out 20 sides of A4.Originally posted by foritisme View PostSo the City would be more regulated with less red tape ??
The regulators themselves appear to sit around arguing and trying to expand the boundaries of their fiefdoms rather than doing the job.
So yes, in a counter intuitive way, less red tape could mean more regulation.Comment
-
I agree in a sense.Originally posted by Purple Dalek View PostMost of the red tape is just there to give jobs to the boys. In financial services much of it is just pointless cut'n'paste, why not just refer to standard paragraphs and regulations taking at most a couple of lines, rather than copy them verbatim and fill out 20 sides of A4.
The regulators themselves appear to sit around arguing and trying to expand the boundaries of their fiefdoms rather than doing the job.
So yes, in a counter intuitive way, less red tape could mean more regulation.
What’s missing is not regulation, but supervision. Regulation involves lots of procedures and paperwork which can often be used to conceal the truth. Supervision involves the influence of experienced and recognised experts in their field who know how to ask the right questions, find the truth and present it in a way which leads to a more responsible course of action.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Today 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Yesterday 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42

Comment