• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The Rock WAS victimised

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Why am I biased?

    .. because that's the only logical reason as to why somebody could possibly believe that a company that is still trading and profitable with assets running into billions, can put forward a view that shareholders should get nothing in compensation, when HMG is expecting to make Billions on floatation. Either biased or stupid. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
      A reasonable definition of bankruptcy is lacking the money to meet the liabilities of the business. NR was £14 Billion short so it's not irrational to call them bankrupt.
      If that is your definition, show me a bank that isn't bankrupt.
      Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
      threadeds website, and here's my blog.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
        .. because that's the only logical reason as to why somebody could possibly believe that a company that is still trading and profitable with assets running into billions, can put forward a view that shareholders should get nothing in compensation, when HMG is expecting to make Billions on floatation. Either biased or stupid. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.
        So anyone who disagrees with you is biased or stupid?

        You sound like Gordon Brown.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
          .. because that's the only logical reason as to why somebody could possibly believe that a company that is still trading and profitable with assets running into billions,
          NR did not have assests running into billions.

          All it had were unsecured loans that might not be paid off

          tim

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by tim123 View Post
            NR did not have assests running into billions.

            All it had were unsecured loans that might not be paid off

            tim

            So a mortgage is an unsecured loan ? Hmmmmm..... the case rests as you obviously have no clue what you are talking about !!

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
              So anyone who disagrees with you is biased or stupid?

              You sound like Gordon Brown.

              No, but you ARE !!

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
                No, but you ARE !!
                So someone who has voted tory all 6 times since being eligible to vote is GB?

                Remind me : why is it they call you cybrcretin again?

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by tim123 View Post
                  NR did not have assests running into billions.

                  All it had were unsecured loans that might not be paid off

                  tim


                  http://www.uksa.org.uk/NorthernRock.htm

                  So please advise how the UKSA come up with a true value at time of nationalisation of 5 pounds a share when the Rock according to you had no assets.....

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
                    So a mortgage is an unsecured loan ? Hmmmmm.....
                    When it's for 125% of the value of the house it is

                    tim

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
                      http://www.uksa.org.uk/NorthernRock.htm

                      So please advise how the UKSA come up with a true value at time of nationalisation of 5 pounds a share when the Rock according to you had no assets.....
                      Because they made the figure up

                      how else could they come up with a figure so far in excess of the one that EVERYBODY else thinks is sensible

                      tim

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X