• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

MSc

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    Utter rubbish.
    LOL - Yawn! Of course it is.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      Hmm, because I don’t know how their MBAs rate, but the Planetary and Space Sciences department is recognized as one of the finest in the world and made a major contribution to the Cassini-Huygens mission. The department, or institute as it is properly known, employs, and has employed some of the finest planetary scientists of our time, including Jocelyn Bell Burnell and Colin Pillinger; without wishing to appear as though I’m making an appeal to authority, I’d suggest that those people don’t do ‘crap’. Maybe I’m biased though as they’re the ones who’ll be awarding my MSc.

      Of course, the original question was about an MSc, and not an MBA.
      I am not disagreeing with you - but put a CV in front of any hiring manager and if one is from say Oxford and another is from OU - you can pretty much bank that in 9.9 times out of 10 it will be the Oxford that gets it.

      Similar - put an OU versus say LSE or even Kingston and more than likely the latter will get the role.

      Obviously it also boils down to what else you have done - but if it was solely on where they attained their MSc - majority would go for the latter.

      Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluding themselves and thinks they know more than they really do in the real world.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester
        By the way, the original questioner was considering getting an education, not an MBA.
        Lol - good point! You mean to tell me MBA's arent worthy [shock horror!]? And MSc are? Come on! Both are as bad as each other.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Liability View Post
          In real world value it sadly is. To use it to get to a decent role it will always be inferior to say a top 5 school. Its like comparing a MBA online to one from LBS.

          When MSC and MBA's are concerned in majority of cases the school you have done it from is what holds the weight, not the actual subject.
          Sorry Liability - but you are spouting such a crock of wank here it's unbelievable.

          Yes qualifications from the top 5 schools (erm, who are they by the way? Oxbridges, Durham....then I'm stuck. Edinburgh? Who's the 5th?) look better than from anywhere else - but an MSc from any other university doesn't look any different to OU. Which is what you were implying.

          I cannot think of one single situation where a company would care where you got your Masters from, apart from possibly the consultancies, but noone with any experience in the real world (which MSc/MBA hoolders tend to have) would want to work for them anyway.
          The pope is a tard.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Liability View Post
            Lol - good point! You mean to tell me MBA's arent worthy [shock horror!]? And MSc are? Come on! Both are as bad as each other.
            It was a bit nasty of me to put it that way, but I just don’t care about getting any more business qualifications; it bores me silly and having done a PGDip with a few MBA courses I remember being bored out of my brain by the MBA stuff; it doesn’t challenge my brain enough to keep me awake.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
              Sorry Liability - but you are spouting such a crock of wink here it's unbelievable.

              Yes qualifications from the top 5 schools (erm, who are they by the way? Oxbridges, Durham....then I'm stuck. Edinburgh? Who's the 5th?) look better than from anywhere else - but an MSc from any other university doesn't look any different to OU. Which is what you were implying.

              I cannot think of one single situation where a company would care where you got your Masters from, apart from possibly the consultancies, but noone with any experience in the real world (which MSc/MBA hoolders tend to have) would want to work for them anyway.
              that is why I said decent roles and to progress. If you are looking to work for a Charity and that kind of ilk and move slower - of course what you say is right - but if you wanted to go the corporate route - what I say still stands even today.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
                What do you mean?
                I mean have you had any career experience in the security space? If not, where's the value in doing a Masters tailored to IT Security?

                Consider what a potential client would think when faced with a CV showing experience in dev or Oracle but then has decided to get an MSc in ITSec.

                Just a thought...
                Older and ...well, just older!!

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  It was a bit nasty of me to put it that way, but I just don’t care about getting any more business qualifications; it bores me silly and having done a PGDip with a few MBA courses I remember being bored out of my brain by the MBA stuff; it doesn’t challenge my brain enough to keep me awake.
                  Agree with you - did my GMAT got an offer from LBS and binned it and took a 18 month role and saved myself 40k and just earned another 180k. Unless you are wanting to get fast tracked into the corporate upper worlds sooner - it really is a waste of time - in fact it's a waste of time anyway - it's merely a tick on the CV for the old boys network.

                  But some people still get hung up on it and want to do them.

                  But I digress - it was an MSc this was about.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Liability View Post
                    that is why I said decent roles and to progress. If you are looking to work for a Charity and that kind of ilk and move slower - of course what you say is right - but if you wanted to go the corporate route - what I say still stands even today.
                    OK, but the OU’s reputation in academia is now very, very good. It takes a while for businesses to cotton on to this kind of thing, but they will cotton on to it, and within a few years OU MBAs will get you a long way in corporates too.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Liability View Post
                      In real world value it sadly is. To use it to get to a decent role it will always be inferior to say a top 5 school. Its like comparing a MBA online to one from LBS.

                      When MSC and MBA's are concerned in majority of cases the school you have done it from is what holds the weight, not the actual subject.
                      MBAs maybe. MSc is assessed by quality, not name

                      OU is rightly highly regarded and is not like "a MBA online".

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X