I always thought the FRVS was set at a certain figure per industry / profession so that you could forego the hassle of the more complicated claiming back system.
So, for example, a farmer may be on 7% FRVS as you would expect him to have a lot of stuff to claim back, whereas an IT professional may be on 13% as he would have less to claim.
I can't see how the government can justify cutting the base rate of VAT without making a commensurate cut in our FRVS or it would make a mockery of the raison d'etre of the whole scheme.
So I conclude there will definitely not be any reduction in our registered Flat Rate, so looks like we will lose 1-2% of our income.
Am I the only one who thinks it strange that one of the central planks of government policy to get us out of a hole of our own making by overbowering is to give incentives to spend more (for a lot of people most probably on credit cards with huge interest rates)?
I can understand tax cuts but not a cut on VAT, which will save a little on fuel bills (which rose 35% this year?) and other essentials (is the other main outgoing food still 0% rated, and I don't think we pay VAT on other main expenditure mortgage?) but I can't really see this saving people money.
Just heard on the radio Canada tried a similar thing earlier this year and it failed miserably.
So, for example, a farmer may be on 7% FRVS as you would expect him to have a lot of stuff to claim back, whereas an IT professional may be on 13% as he would have less to claim.
I can't see how the government can justify cutting the base rate of VAT without making a commensurate cut in our FRVS or it would make a mockery of the raison d'etre of the whole scheme.
So I conclude there will definitely not be any reduction in our registered Flat Rate, so looks like we will lose 1-2% of our income.
Am I the only one who thinks it strange that one of the central planks of government policy to get us out of a hole of our own making by overbowering is to give incentives to spend more (for a lot of people most probably on credit cards with huge interest rates)?
I can understand tax cuts but not a cut on VAT, which will save a little on fuel bills (which rose 35% this year?) and other essentials (is the other main outgoing food still 0% rated, and I don't think we pay VAT on other main expenditure mortgage?) but I can't really see this saving people money.
Just heard on the radio Canada tried a similar thing earlier this year and it failed miserably.

Comment