• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Only in the free world

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    AKs can kill a lot more in one 'go' than a car. You don't hear much of kids driving their car around the school corridors moving students down.

    There's no place for deadly weapons in a 'civilised' society. We can sleep easy knowing the govermin have the terrorists at bay.
    Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
    Feist - I Feel It All
    Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by PAH View Post
      AKs can kill a lot more in one 'go' than a car.
      Let's say one crazy AK owner will kill 100 people once a year, is that reasonable estimate?

      Ok, in USA in 2004 traffic accidents killed 42,636 in one year. If you want to save people you should focus on top causes of death - car accidents, cancer, AIDS - the AK wielding crazies will be at the very bottom of the list.

      Note here - kids get killed in accidents too, far more so than from AK shots.

      If you look at %-tage of legal gun owners in the USA (including AK) and legal car owners, you will find that a lot greater %-tage of car owners cause death by their driving then legal gun owners. That's really the end of the arguement until car deaths are cut to much lower point than they are now.

      Comment


        #13
        It's not the numbers, it's the way. Otherwise why all the fuss over 911. People want to feel safe.

        A kid being gunned down is going to be more traumatic to relatives than if they are killed in a car crash, as one could be seen to be accidental where the other is with intent. All about 'closure'.
        Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
        Feist - I Feel It All
        Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by PAH View Post
          It's not the numbers, it's the way. Otherwise why all the fuss over 911. People want to feel safe.
          I think the "fuss" about 911 was justified in a way that 911 it was airplanes but if nothing it done about it then it will be nukes next. Also you can't carpet bomb your own cities to get retribution so in case of AK it won't work, but you can do that in afganistan. It's internal vs external thingy.

          A kid being gunned down is going to be more traumatic to relatives than if they are killed in a car crash
          So if their kid got killed by drunk youth without driving license and insurance, would they feel a lot better when he was shot? I'd expect them to feel terrible in both cases - you can put a lot of effort and money to reduce very rare shootings like this OR you can safe a lot more kids from car crashes.

          Comment


            #15
            It's not either/or. Maybe they could do both.

            Have they prized the rifle from Charlton Heston's cold dead hand yet?
            Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
            Feist - I Feel It All
            Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

            Comment


              #16
              it's probably got something to do with Hedge funds
              Confusion is a natural state of being

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by PAH View Post
                It's not either/or. Maybe they could do both.
                It's very difficult to get zero incident rate - there will always be a few people who go nuts when you deal with 200 mln firearms issues, with say 100 mln gun owners (conservative figure) just 1 going crazy every year and shooting everyone then you are talking about 0.000001% "failure rate", compare this with cars where in USA 18 deaths on 10,000 car owners, that's 0.180000% failure rate, see the difference in numbers?

                Stats: http://www.driveandstayalive.com/inf.../stats-usa.htm

                So it's obvious that the best reduction can be achieved (if at all) is in cars, with guns sure you can try to be more careful look at reasons why that guy went nuts, however when you deal with very small numbers you can't guarantee success - removing guns from 99.999999% law abiding citizens is not acceptable solution just like getting rid of cars ain't.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  I think the "fuss" about 911 was justified in a way that 911 it was airplanes but if nothing it done about it then it will be nukes next. Also you can't carpet bomb your own cities to get retribution so in case of AK it won't work, but you can do that in afganistan. It's internal vs external thingy.



                  So if their kid got killed by drunk youth without driving license and insurance, would they feel a lot better when he was shot? I'd expect them to feel terrible in both cases - you can put a lot of effort and money to reduce very rare shootings like this OR you can safe a lot more kids from car crashes.
                  Honestly, do you just come here to be argumentative no matter how much of a retard it makes you look?

                  42836 car deaths in 2004, as you've already stated.


                  29659 gun deaths in the same year.


                  Hardly an insignificant proportion is it...
                  ǝןqqıʍ

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
                    I don't care if criminals shoot each other from guns, also I don't care if legit gun owners gun down criminals or suicides - we are here discussing crazy cases like here legit gun owner shots innocent boy for no good reason. Such cases are very rare.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      I nominate Councillor Charles Edens for an international award for 'Understatement of the Year' for this particular gem;


                      County Councilman Charles Edens said he lives just a few blocks away ...
                      "It's going to put a dampening on Halloween," Eden said.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X