Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Can't-believe-we-got-away-with-this thread
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Shimano105 View PostI'll start:
.......
Them were the days - money for old rope!Comment
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostHmm - I don't really want to talk about some of my "skeletons"And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostHmm - I don't really want to talk about some of my "skeletons"Comment
-
The last client I was at I wrote a access db to control the ordering for Central Europe. Thats around 600 stores a few billion pounds a year.
All the buyers have a sheet to "range" products. They select what they are going to buy selling prices click upload and it orders them for it.
Simple. Its how its written not what its made in.Comment
-
Originally posted by oracleslave View PostThat peoplesoft stuff is not that bad. Fortunately you will be fused into a proper technology shortlyComment
-
Originally posted by Sockpuppet View PostThe last client I was at I wrote a access db to control the ordering for Central Europe. Thats around 600 stores a few billion pounds a year.
All the buyers have a sheet to "range" products. They select what they are going to buy selling prices click upload and it orders them for it.
Simple. Its how its written not what its made in.
*sockpuppet rises several notches in estimation*
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Yes but I believe that Access nowadays is a different beast to back then (does it use a form of SQL Server?).
In the past with JET you were essential using a single file with some attempt at locking and claiming it was an enterprise level database! This file also contained all the code.Comment
-
Originally posted by Shimano105 View PostYes but I believe that Access nowadays is a different beast to back then (does it use a form of SQL Server?).
In the past with JET you were essential using a single file with some attempt at locking and claiming it was an enterprise level database! This file also contained all the code.Comment
-
Originally posted by Shimano105 View PostYes but I believe that Access nowadays is a different beast to back then (does it use a form of SQL Server?).
In the past with JET you were essential using a single file with some attempt at locking and claiming it was an enterprise level database! This file also contained all the code.
It was never a good idea to mix code with tables, anyone who was any good never did that!
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Yesterday 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Comment