Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Icelandic petition 'We Are not terroists'
Collapse
X
-
Yep, putting all that taxpayers’ money was particularly cruel.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Why ?Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostAlthough your post was
I do think that GB has treated the Icelandic banks disgracefully
They were about to go under and we grabbed the money unlike with BCCI were the yanks grabbed the money and the UK account holders got nowt.
I know Cybertory thinks Northern Crock were a going concern flush with spare cash but with both this shower of tulip and the Icelandic banks they had had it with or without GB.Comment
-
If the Icelanders can be forced to provide us all with free cod for the rest of our lives I’m sure we could iron out any diplomatic difficulties.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I'm gonna assume your error here was on purpose.Originally posted by Bumfluff View PostAgreed my grammer was poor
Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.Comment
-
Because Iceland is a member of NATO and an ally of the British. They are a very pro British nation. Using anti terror legislation to conduct a knee jerk reaction is appalling (and I hope all you who favour ID cards are looking at this). What Brown did was to effectively bankcrupt Iceland. No attempt oir little attempt has been made to discuss matters and find a way through the problem.Originally posted by rootsnall View PostWhy ?
They were about to go under and we grabbed the money unlike with BCCI were the yanks grabbed the money and the UK account holders got nowt.
I know Cybertory thinks Northern Crock were a going concern flush with spare cash but with both this shower of tulip and the Icelandic banks they had had it with or without GB.
Brown is a Clunking fist Bully who would not have done this to a bank of a larger more powerful nation.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Agreed that it was typical NuLabour bullying to use terrorism legislation, but that’s what they do to everybody these days; remember Walter Wolfgang?Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostBecause Iceland is a member of NATO and an ally of the British. They are a very pro British nation. Using anti terror legislation to conduct a knee jerk reaction is appalling (and I hope all you who favour ID cards are looking at this). What Brown did was to effectively bankcrupt Iceland. No attempt oir little attempt has been made to discuss matters and find a way through the problem.
Brown is a Clunking fist Bully who would not have done this to a bank of a larger more powerful nation.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Just because the legislation used has the word terrorism in its title does not mean it was used against terrorists (though I think it was anti terror clauses that were used). That is just bluster from Icelandic ministers to gain sympathy and throw the trail off them.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAgreed that it was typical NuLabour bullying to use terrorism legislation, but that’s what they do to everybody these days; remember Walter Wolfgang?
The freeze on assets was only announced after Iceland announced it would not be protecting foreign money in its banks and that it would be defaulting on loans it had with other countries.
Hardly the actions of a friendly ally with good intentions.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
So if they give us all their fishing rights it’ll all be alright?Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostJust because the legislation used has the word terrorism in its title does not mean it was used against terrorists (though I think it was anti terror clauses that were used). That is just bluster from Icelandic ministers to gain sympathy and throw the trail off them.
The freeze on assets was only announced after Iceland announced it would not be protecting foreign money in its banks and that it would be defaulting on loans it had with other countries.
Hardly the actions of a friendly ally with good intentions.
Oh, and perhaps some free electricity from their geothermal generators; they can borrow the money to pay for the cable..And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
-
I would happily support using terror legislation to grab thieving bastards like Richard Fuld who took huge bonuses while bankrupting their employers and thoroughly fooking the world’s economy. Maybe it’s time for Britain to use ‘extraordinary rendition’ tactics to drag irresponsible bank directors off to some Grottistan with no human rights and give them a bit of ‘enhanced interrogation’.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Yesterday 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment