Originally posted by Xenophon
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Oh dear, beeker banned
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Xenophon View PostI think you're thinking about it too hard.
People that get banned from here will have posted stuff that the Admin/Mods don't like. Whenever someone gets banned people always come out with comments wondering why. In probably 90% of the people I see banned from here I am not in the slightest bit surprised when it happens, but others are.
That is what confuses me.
Oh, and if the other bannings are like beeker, which they may well be, then the board Admin has done it themselves. There is no conspiracy from 'board regulars' behind it.
I'm afraid I'm in the confused camp (regarding the banning!) too.
I've read the whole thread.
He called you a puff loads of times (I think with some justification).
You called him a ginger twat loads of times (with total justification).
He was banned
you weren't
(and come on, wearing make-up and winking on web cams, you were asking for the abuse)
just my (unasked for) £0.02Comment
-
TBH, same here.Originally posted by Archangel View PostI'm afraid I'm in the confused camp (regarding the banning!) too.
I've read the whole thread.
He called you a puff loads of times (I think with some justification).
You called him a ginger twat loads of times (with total justification).
He was banned
you weren't
(and come on, wearing make-up and winking on web cams, you were asking for the abuse)
just my (unasked for) £0.02Comment
-
Disagree.Originally posted by Archangel View PostHe called you a puff loads of times (I think with some justification).
You called him a ginger twat loads of times (with total justification).
He was banned
you weren't
(and come on, wearing make-up and winking on web cams, you were asking for the abuse)
You can't call someone gay because you don't agree with them sprucing themselves up. It makes no sense, unless you live in Victorian times.
It is also bang out of order and would potentially seriously offend real gay people.
Is that more clear?
If you want to know why he as banned though then I am not the person to ask, am I?Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.Comment
-
Comment
-
FFSOriginally posted by Platypus View PostTBH, same here.
He started it and would not stop. I retaliated. He was clearly the instigator and he wouldn't stop and paid the price.
Don't think I'm bullet-proof.Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.Comment
-
Just because a man spruces himself up, wears eyeliner, knows the words to every abba song ever written and w4nks himself off on a webcam you accuse him of...Originally posted by Xenophon View PostDisagree.
You can't call someone gay because you don't agree with them sprucing themselves up. It makes no sense, unless you live in Victorian times.
It is also bang out of order and would potentially seriously offend real gay people.
Is that more clear?
If you want to know why he as banned though then I am not the person to ask, am I?
Ah bollocks, this is just so ******' funny.
Xeno, when I see you I'm going to buy you a very very large babycham. Kudos man, kudos!Last edited by Churchill; 20 June 2008, 09:40.Comment
-
-
I think you both - Archangel and Platypus are sock puppets, with only a couple of hundred posts.
At least have the bollocks to post under your usual logins!Comment
-
Is calling someone gay an offence then?Originally posted by Xenophon View PostDisagree.
You can't call someone gay because you don't agree with them sprucing themselves up. It makes no sense, unless you live in Victorian times.
It is also bang out of order and would potentially seriously offend real gay people.
Is that more clear?
If you want to know why he as banned though then I am not the person to ask, am I?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Comment