Originally posted by DiscoStu
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Well done to all that contributed.
Collapse
X
-
The Argentinians faked the damage to the airfield. The Vulcan bombers did not do any damage that prevented normal air operations from the airfield. It was the Harriers air superiority that prevented that and the inability of the Argentinians to extend the runway to permit Skyhawks and Mirages to use the airfield. -
Fantastic book, also read it this year.Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostVulcan 607? I read it too, quite amazing the resourcefulness the RAF showed in getting a Vulcan down there.
Must remember to pass it on to my brother, he's just come out of the Air Force and spent the last 12 years at RAF Waddington.Coffee's for closersComment
-
I think instead of "Should Try Harder" you should be "Knows **** All!"Originally posted by M_B View PostEspecially as we missed, which is probably why it isn't mentioned in the article.Comment
-
WHSOriginally posted by Churchill View PostI think instead of "Should Try Harder" you should be "Knows **** All!"ǝןqqıʍComment
-
Oh right.Originally posted by Churchill View PostI think instead of "Should Try Harder" you should be "Knows **** All!"
You'll be pointing out my error then, without using wikipedia.Comment
-
Considering your research was wikipedia, I wouldn't be so sure.Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostWHSComment
-
Abso-bleedin-lutely.Originally posted by M_B View PostOh right.
You'll be pointing out my error then, without using wikipedia.
Do you care to provide your sources?Comment
-
You first. What damage did the Vulcan bombers do during the falklands ?Originally posted by Churchill View PostAbso-bleedin-lutely.
Do you care to provide your sources?Comment
-
Unless you sit behind me, how would you have any idea what my research was?Originally posted by M_B View PostConsidering your research was wikipedia, I wouldn't be so sure.ǝןqqıʍComment
-
Doing what? I may know him...Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostFantastic book, also read it this year.
Must remember to pass it on to my brother, he's just come out of the Air Force and spent the last 12 years at RAF Waddington.Older and ...well, just older!!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella, PEO/GPP, or salaried EOR. Which is up 153% in 2026? Aug 6 08:43
- Outside IR35 isn’t making a comeback in 2026/27 — it’s something more complex Aug 5 04:55
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Aug 3 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59

Comment