• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Immigrants, house prices, it's all here

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    ...
    PS It is those bosses and their greed who mainly drive this nonsense, not the politically correct.
    Agreed. It is the same in catering and agriculture as in IT: there is no shortage of skills, just a shortage of people willing to do the work for what employers want to pay. Pay the rate for the job and you will get all the staff you need.

    Comment


      #12
      Don't panic! we're still going to get the immigration we need! Brown has decided to ignore the report:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7324485.stm
      "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "


      Thomas Jefferson

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
        Actually, since we are all skilled, educated workers here, what we really want is more low skilled immigrants with less qualifications and fewer highly educated immigrants.
        It may seem so, but it's a wrong point of view IMO. Consider if I wasn't in this country - I'd then work for offshoring business and would certainly help take out a lot of jobs out of this country. The best IT people from around the world should be able to come here to work and live - this way their cost base will be the same as yours, and offshore companies there will be deprived of the best people. Sure competition locally might be harder, however this would seriously limit potential for offshoring.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by expat View Post
          there is no shortage of skills, just a shortage of people willing to do the work for what employers want to pay.
          Turns out locals prefer to be on unemployment benefits rather than pick strawberries or hard labour work like this. If job rate for picking up strawberries would go up to satisfy those lazy on-benefits-locals then it would result not in boost to inflation, but simply local producers will go bust as they would have no chance of competing with imports. In effect in this case cheaper imported labour helps save remnants of local manufacturing.

          The preferred solution of course would be got Govt to tell people on benefits that they have to work or lose benefits.

          Comment


            #15
            Couple on BBC this morning

            They must think that most (if not all) voters are mentally retarded. There was a young couple from Latvia on the BBC Breakfast News that were looking to buy a house and were being interviewed about the benefits that they enjoy (free health/education/benefits/etc/etc). The young min ger said 'We are earning min wage and I think we are entitled to all the benefits (inc. £ 5000 pa nursery fees). If I were interviewing them, I would ask them: 'How the fu ck are you buying the house then if you are on min wage??' To which the honest answer would have been: 'Cos me and my partner get cash in hand, innit??' Don't you think we've got enough of those home-grown spongers already?'

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
              An important quote which puts NL's side:

              Liam Byrne, the immigration minister, said last night: "This report is a welcome contribution to our huge immigration shake-up.

              "It proves we were right to set up the independent Migration Advisory Committee to tell us which workers our new Australian-style points system should keep out or let in."

              However, the committee was "not persuaded" that this represented the radical overhaul that was needed.
              Twats...
              Did Australia have mass unchecked immigration before they put their system in place then? They're not comparing apples with apples are they.
              Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                Did Australia have mass unchecked immigration before they put their system in place then? They're not comparing apples with apples are they.
                Yes, but those immigrants were white, innit?

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                  Did Australia have mass unchecked immigration before they put their system in place then? They're not comparing apples with apples are they.
                  Be fair, they had to pay a tenner to get in.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    If I were interviewing them, I would ask them: 'How the fu ck are you buying the house then if you are on min wage??'
                    It's the same as how someone with no visible means of income can magic £7000 for a holiday in Goa...

                    Liebour's view on immigration is:-

                    1. Whatever the large liebour coffer paying big business want

                    2. To use it as a means to attack an opposition party through leftie-sympathetic media tugging on the champagne socialist heartstrings

                    3. To pay lip service to cap it whenever an anti-immigration opposition party looks like making a swing in the marginals.


                    I spoke to someone today who took the UK Citizen Test - a pile of politically correct twaddle that is either trivial, irrelevant, advertising welfare and a deliberate sleight of hand to disguise the real problem of not having a proper border security system.
                    Last edited by hyperD; 1 April 2008, 14:16.
                    If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by hyperD View Post
                      I spoke to someone today who took the UK Citizen Test - a pile of politically correct twaddle that is either trivial, irrelevant, advertising welfare and a deliberate sleight of hand to disguise the real problem of not having a proper border security system.
                      The idea behind UK Citizen test is that those who can't understand English wont' get passports. I took it and it is fairly easy, IMO, they should have replaced it with Cambridge Proficiency test - if you pass that well then you are probably good enough.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X