Originally posted by KathyWoolfe
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Unfair Contract ?
Collapse
X
-
There is a proposed change on the way but the COE and some of the Tories aren't too happy about it."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
So did I. Another reason I haven't yet bought a house, I can move into hers instead and take half of it if we split up. Of course I won't tell her I'm only renting at the moment, so she'll be unawares.Originally posted by KathyWoolfe View PostI thought the law was changed recently to give common law partners the same rights as married couples?
Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
No it hasn't - this was just an idea proposed by the lawyers - no doubt in response to the threat to their income posed by the lack of marriages (apologies - I have a thing about lawyers and the law grrr).Originally posted by KathyWoolfe View PostI thought the law was changed recently to give common law partners the same rights as married couples?Comment
-
You're not really taking this "life-partner" stuff on board are you?Originally posted by PAH View PostSo did I. Another reason I haven't yet bought a house, I can move into hers instead and take half of it if we split up. Of course I won't tell her I'm only renting at the moment, so she'll be unawares.
"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostYou're not really taking this "life-partner" stuff on board are you?
A bird's for christmas not for life.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
That's the worst time to have one, you need to buy presents and talk about whose parents you'll be visiting...Originally posted by PAH View PostA bird's for christmas not for life."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
It’s people’s unrealistic expectations cultivated by non stop celebrity culture, narcissistic looks and personality, body and image cult, coupled with goo goo feel good liberalism which has encouraged everyone to believe they are a potential superstar and God’s gift to the Creation. Me, I always know my place.Comment
-
I'm neither (CofE nor Tory) and I'm not happy about it. At the moment you have a choice - marriage gives one set of rights/benefits etc, and choosing not to gives a different set. What's the point of removing the distinction?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostThere is a proposed change on the way but the COE and some of the Tories aren't too happy about it.Comment
-
What's to stop a professional gold-digger from pretending she's your common law wife, even though you may never have even set eyes on her, let alone lived with her?
Easy to add herself to the electoral role for the address, and apply for a few things tying her to the place. The poor guy would probably think any letters in her name were for a previous occupier.
I suggest everyone keeps their eyes open for any mail addressed for a certain H Mills!Last edited by PAH; 26 March 2008, 17:41.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Indeed.Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostI'm neither (CofE nor Tory) and I'm not happy about it. At the moment you have a choice - marriage gives one set of rights/benefits etc, and choosing not to gives a different set. What's the point of removing the distinction?
Some have argued that the "Civil Partnership" should be extended to allow men and women to have a formal, recognized partnership but not have the institution of marriage which some find offensive. WTF?
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Today 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Yesterday 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16

Comment