Or the thieves could have used an unoccupied address for the delivery. All too easy.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Bank Card Fraud - Like this?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by TonyEnglish View PostI think he means that even our police should be able to see who accepted the goods by checking the delivery address - unless the thief is buying goods for random people.
Wouldn't suprise me if the fuzz need to apply for a court order to obtain the details off Tesco, due to data protection laws, and are then more likely to not bother chasing it up. Instead they'll just tell you to claim it back off the card company.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Since the advent of Chip & Pin, the card companies are no longer obliged to pay it back, the onus is now on the retailer to prevent fraud and pay it back.Originally posted by PAH View PostWouldn't suprise me if the fuzz need to apply for a court order to obtain the details off Tesco, due to data protection laws, and are then more likely to not bother chasing it up. Instead they'll just tell you to claim it back off the card company.
This is why the card companies pushed so hard for chip and pin and retailers resisted it......Comment
-
I don't think the companies really care anyway.
I had a card that I hadn't used for at least 6 months, then used it at the petrol station next door to work. The next month there were a load of transactions for petrol I hadn't bought in places I had never been to.
So it was pretty obvious where the cloning had happened, so I pointed this out to them - they really didn't seem to give a monkeys.
Was rather annoying at the time.
Rhubarb.Comment
-
The banks just claim it off the retailer.Originally posted by rhubarb View PostI don't think the companies really care anyway.
.
They then don't report the figures so they can claim chip and pin is safe.
And when some boffins from Cambridge show clearly how it isn't safe and offer to give them the information they ignore it until it gets on Watchdog."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Correct (IMHO)Originally posted by rhubarb View PostI don't think the companies really care anyway.
Rhubarb.
I had a similar experience after ordering some stuff online from a car restoration company - they used a "secure" site to process the transaction (can't remember the name but one I'd used before). Next day, card co phoned to ask if I was really buying stuff at dixons in Hull and cinema tickets somewhere down south at the same time. I said no - they sent me a form to sign to say the transactions weren't mine.
Neither the card provider or the retailer then wanted to know anything else.
IIRC Plod don't even investigate this any more due to a change in the law - in my case they weren't interested as I hadn't suffered any loss.
No-one wants to know, and the card cos and banks don't want us talking about how easy and widespread it is.Comment
-
Originally posted by r0bly0ns View PostThis is why the card companies pushed so hard for chip and pin and retailers resisted it......
Not much use for internet or other card holder not present transactions though is it.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostNo-one wants to know, and the card cos and banks don't want us talking about how easy and widespread it is.
Ok, better not talk about it anymore. End of thread.
Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Tee hee - I meant (IMHO) of course, they are scared tulipless that confidence will break down and their revenue stream will dry up. Not scared enough to do anything that might involve spending a bit of cash, thoughOriginally posted by PAH View PostOk, better not talk about it anymore. End of thread.
Comment
-
Nope.Originally posted by PAH View PostNot much use for internet or other card holder not present transactions though is it.
I've had this done to me twice, once with a chip and pin card and once some years ago.
Both times the card details were nicked by petrol stations (I know as they were both new cards that had never been used before), and both times they were used to by things through cardholder not present transactions.
I'm still a bit puzzled as to how the petrol station got the details of my chip & pin card though .......
Once the forms have been signed giving the bank / card company permission to investigate, you get your money back and legaly the fraud no longer has anything to do with you so you never hear anything else about it.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment