Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Hunt for £100m rogue trader after attack on HBOS share price
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by AtW View Post...dump them in hope they can buy them back cheaper..."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostI am pro free market."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by bored View PostSo if someone buys shares for X, then sells them for 2X 10 years later and buys a house, the house is also an illusion?
It's elementary really - I can't believe I have to explain such obvious economic things. But then again I am dealing here with geeks who won't see beyond their immediate profit.Comment
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostNo, you are not.
If stock market people were only playing with their own money then I would not care less - problem is that these games affect real economy in a big way, so good regulation is not only desireable but absolutely necessary.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostYou are confusing a micro-situation (your own house) with marco-situation - whole picture. For example if you take part in pyramid scheme early then you can make money and buy real house, so you'd think the scheme is for real? Maybe for you, but the rest of the participants get violated, so overall the scheme is an illusion.
It's elementary really - I can't believe I have to explain such obvious economic things. But then again I am dealing here with geeks who won't see beyond their immediate profit."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostWhat difference does it make if I hold a futures contract (or several) for six seconds, six hours, or six months?
I also have problem with people buying shares and selling them in 5 minutes - there should be a legal minimum during which you have to keep the stuff you buy, and you have to pay for it in full - no leverages. You should either have 100% money for your stock market purchase or you don't buy it, end of story.
It is leveraging (or gearing) that allows big funds to risk relatively small amounts of money but create trades that greatly affect market - it's bad enough those guys don't actually have the money to cover their position in full (so that they have to sell when margin calls come and in situation like now this negatively affects market due to forced selling), but they actually start to influence market in a big way - that's market manipulation.
All big stock trades should be subject to compulsory disclosure in advance - just like insiders have to do, same should apply to any big transaction.Comment
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostPot calling kettle, pot calling kettle, Comms check, over.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostI actually have a degree in Finance, and generally speaking I've spent plenty of time studying macroeconomics. What do you know about it? Bugger all it seems
Grow up FFS."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostAtW is well past Barking and probably has run into the buffers at Upminster on this one.
He is burrowing home towards Mother Russia via Barking, you see.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Yesterday 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
Comment