• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The future - back to living in straw huts

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    no wonder it on'y cost 4k, it's tiny, what is, a studio house built in the highlands !!

    Milan.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by motoukenin View Post
      Sewage goes out the window then ?
      Or in Milan's case "in" the window, where he then muddies it up and pastes it on this site!
      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by threaded View Post
        The house I live in currently has a straw roof and many of the walls are made from mud. It was built in 1600, so I'd suggest there's no'w't wrong with the materials.
        Agree.

        Easy to work, durable and energy-efficient. Kept our ancestors sheltered for many thousands of years. A bit flammable roof-wise, but otherwise top notch.

        Modern building materials offer only aesthetic advantages (to some), rather than practical ones.

        If I could build my dream house, it would either be a mud/straw shell, wood, or a cast concrete shell. Can't decide which. You can keep your bricks!

        You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by motoukenin View Post
          Sewage goes out the window then ?
          Ah! the good old days

          Plague anyone?
          Confusion is a natural state of being

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by PAH View Post
            I saw something like that on Grand Designs a couple of years ago.

            Do you need planning permission to put a haystack in your field?
            No you don't - that was the plan of the farmer who couldn't get planning to build a house so he built it anyway and put a huge haystack around it so no-one could see it.

            He now has to tear the house down - after living in it for a number of years.

            I'd post a link if I could be arsed
            Si posse, recte, si non, quocumque modo rem

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Bear View Post
              No you don't - that was the plan of the farmer who couldn't get planning to build a house so he built it anyway and put a huge haystack around it so no-one could see it.

              He now has to tear the house down - after living in it for a number of years.

              I'd post a link if I could be arsed
              I could be arsed

              Here
              Si posse, recte, si non, quocumque modo rem

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Bear View Post
                I could be arsed

                Here

                Interesting:
                a house that stands for four years without objection had a legal right to remain.
                With the general incompetence of government and councils 4 years should be easy as long as you keep the locals sweet so they don't report you. They probably only use google maps nowadays to identify new structures, so just make sure it's on the edge of a sensitive location such as a US air base!

                I wonder what the outcome was then, seeing as it was due in feb?
                Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
                Feist - I Feel It All
                Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Bear View Post
                  No you don't - that was the plan of the farmer who couldn't get planning to build a house so he built it anyway and put a huge haystack around it so no-one could see it.

                  He now has to tear the house down - after living in it for a number of years.

                  I'd post a link if I could be arsed
                  I think you got the order wrong (not entirely sure). But I seem to recall the farmer started by building the huge haystack, and then managed to build the castle by tunneling around inside the haystack without ever leaving any of the building visible from outside.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    NSFW http://eatliver.com/i.php?n=2690
                    Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                    threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
                      no wonder it on'y cost 4k, it's tiny, what is, a studio house built in the highlands !!

                      Milan.
                      I do believe that you are sadly out of touch with house prices in the Highlands. Most of the buyers are recent sellers of properties in SE England, so that does tend to determine the size of the demand and its bank; the number of houses for sale there relative to the population of SE Englanders who fancy retiring to the Highlands determines the supply. The resulting supply/demand intersection is not where you might expect it to be if you thought it was cheap just because there's no work there.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X