• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Running over scrotes

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
    He wasn't allowed to defend himself. Which goes against what we're being told by the police. I hope he appeals and gets let out. And the judge gets sacked.
    No - he was allowed to defend himself.

    What he was not allowed to do was to turn that form of defence into a form of attack that was out of proportion to the attack. Mounting the pavement and driving into him when he was in the bushes is out of proportion, hence the judgement.

    This is why all cars should be banned.
    Last edited by TheFaQQer; 14 February 2008, 11:36.
    Best Forum Advisor 2014
    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
      No - he was allowed to defend himself.

      What he was not allowed to do was to turn that form of defence into a form of attack that was out of proportion to the attack. Mounting the pavement and driving into him when he was in the bushes is out of proportion, hence the judgement.

      This is why all cars should be banned.
      Have you never heard the phrase "The best form of defence is attack"?

      The scrote would probably have been back to carry out more of his own form of justice. He deserved what he got, IMHO.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by threaded View Post
        Don't believe what the plod tell you: there is no such thing as a plea of 'self-defence' in English law. If you find yourself in that situation, kill 'em, and always have a friend who's a pig farmer.
        Isn't that a (not so urban) myth that pigs will eat and digest every part of a human body, including the bigger bones?

        Wouldn't be anywhere as useful if all they do is scat out the skeleton!
        Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
        Feist - I Feel It All
        Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
          The scrote would probably have been back to carry out more of his own form of justice.
          Agreed - but that wouldn't be recognised in our flawed "innocent until proven guilty" judicial system.

          Even though perhaps it should be - we all know that the scrotes hanging around the streets will be up to no good as soon as people's heads are turned.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by chicane View Post
            Agreed - but that wouldn't be recognised in our flawed "innocent until proven guilty" judicial system.

            Even though perhaps it should be - we all know that the scrotes hanging around the streets will be up to no good as soon as people's heads are turned.
            Which bit is flawed? Because I am very much in favour of a presumption of innocence......

            Comment

            Working...
            X