Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
the impression I got, from the Independent Schools Statement, was that they are not too worried as pretty much all private schools offer bursaries, hardship funds, etc., and this would be sufficient to satisfy the requirements.
... but the problem is that now Labour has a stick to bash them with & it really depends how independent the Charity Commission is from political interference.
Who selects the CC? can’t be ar5ed to google
How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think
you have the numpty cheap ones which are no better and worse than the good comps and then you have the good private schools which the majority of parents cannot afford to send their children to anyway
which is best, the cheap private school which is crap or getting your children into a good comp ?
There is no rule of thumb. For a junior, average fees are £ 3k a term, roughly £ 1k a month. For a senior, this can go up to £ 6k a term (OK, Eton etc charge more), but this has nothing to do with the child's ability. A lot of bursaries apply, so once you are through with the exam, you may end up paying next to nothing depending on siblings, performance etc. This is a myth, ie that you have to pay a lot, cultivated by the socialists and unfortunately believed by a lot of people like our friend MB.
if you're paying less than 1k gbp per month per child you're wasting your time and may as well get them into the best comp in your area
that's a general rule of thumb
Milan.
I pay £7k/year, but my son is 5 (prices rise with age, especially at age 6).
The difference is day and night against the previous state school, he's made so much more progress, gets attention for his needs (no special needs, just catch-up work because state schools teach less to children than he would have got had he started in reception at private).
Definitely worth it, even at primary level. He has more facilities, for art (pottery kiln, properly equipped rooms), science (lab with bunsen burners), sport (cricket pitch, swimming pool, football pitch, shale hockey pitch, tennis courts, adventure playground), and more teaching (Latin, French, Greek, and proper history) than most state SECONDARY schools.
Not to mention that his class is half the size of state, he gets one-to-one teaching on Fridays, and he has specialist teachers for different subjects.
The problem is that although obviously they get more dough than state and can provide better ratios, better facilities, where they really get their edge is that they depend on the parents to actually give a fig about their kids' education, to work with them and stuff.
In the state school they knew many parents don't care, and had no expectations of the parents.
Furthermore, in addition to the fees paid for your child, you are also paying for the state education of another child through your taxation. This is fair.
There is no rule of thumb. For a junior, average fees are £ 3k a term, roughly £ 1k a month. For a senior, this can go up to £ 6k a term (OK, Eton etc charge more), but this has nothing to do with the child's ability. A lot of bursaries apply, so once you are through with the exam, you may end up paying next to nothing depending on siblings, performance etc. This is a myth, ie that you have to pay a lot, cultivated by the socialists and unfortunately believed by a lot of people like our friend MB.
It's also cheaper oop north.
A best-in-country school oop North, such as Leeds Grammar, will be quite substantially cheaper than say Royal Guildford Grammar. Both schools are pretty much top 50 in all schools, but LGS is £9,225/year, and RGS is £11,757/year.
A best-in-country school oop North, such as Leeds Grammar, will be quite substantially cheaper than say Royal Guildford Grammar. Both schools are pretty much top 50 in all schools, but LGS is £9,225/year, and RGS is £11,757/year.
I would gladly pay the difference to be in Guildford as opposed to Leeds.
Comment