- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Claiming benefits between contracts
Collapse
X
-
-
I signed on once.
I told them my exact situation (company director of one-man company, no work, no money in company account.) They let me sign on for seven months. Think I might have had to get P45 from accountant. Far from forcing me to get work as a data-entry clerk, their pamphlet stressed that they wanted me to find similar employment to my previous one. Not only did I get the £50 a week (or whatever) - they paid my mortgage for a while as well. In order to qualify for the latter I had to have little savings. I wrote them a letter explaining that I had 10-20K in shares in unlisted companies, which I could not sell easily, and under the rules the difficulty of selling meant those savings did not count. (The unlisted companies were "Business Expansion Scheme" investments, which I'd put my savings into in order to get the 40% tax-relief on offer.)
That was 1991 though. The rules have changed since then. In particular, people with large mortgages no longer get help. There was outrage in the early 90s when some guy with a 450K mortgage was getting his interest paid, and they brought in a limit saying income support would not pay out if the mortgage was over 100K. My mortgage was 120K, so even two or three years after I claimed I would no longer have been eligible for what I got, due to rule changes.
I worked out that I would have to be paid well over 20K to be better off working than on benefits. (At the time my flat was worth 40K less than the mortgage though, so even if it was in my personality to be work-shy, the threat of repossession and bankruptcy would have been enough to motivate me.)
Even at the time, I realised I was very lucky to pass all the tests to qualify. There were so many rules which would have disqualified me had my circumstances been the slightest bit different from what they were.Last edited by IR35 Avoider; 24 December 2007, 11:52.Comment
-
It's funny how it is almost impossible to avoid paying NI, yet claiming money you paid is also impossible. There is something fundamentally wrong in such an arrangement.Originally posted by IR35 Avoider View PostThere were so many rules which would have disqualified me had my circumstances been the slightest bit different from what they were.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25
- Contractors eyeing mortgages ‘unrealistic about BoE’s 3.75% hold decision’ May 11 07:50
- The fake job problem is getting worse. Are contractors a particularly easy target? May 8 07:49
- Government policy on freelancing is stopping the contractor model from doing its thing May 7 08:12
- Contractors, can the new HMRC loan charge settlement opportunity reduce your bill? May 6 07:51
- PGMOL’s ‘not finely balanced’ win over HMRC could be ‘persuasive’ in IR35 cases May 5 07:10
- Is Reporting Company Payments to Participators a concerning consultation for contractors? Apr 29 07:38
- Now it’s finally here, how is HMRC Joint & Several Liability risk being managed, and is payment control the holy grail? Apr 28 06:55
- How Managed Service Providers (MSPs) are hit by HMRC’s Joint & Several Liability Apr 27 06:08





Comment