• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Commuting expenses and clients refusal to pay..?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Dow Jones View Post
    Timesheets may show travel expenses incurred as a result of travelling between client sites or hotel accommodation as a result of working late at night which is normal. It is NOT normal to be paid travel expenses for commuting or hotel expenses if you work away from home (there are ways of claiming some of these back legally via ltd.co/brolly.) If that were the case however, you should have charged your client the time it took to travel from home and v.v. as well - at least that would have been consistent! I am not saying you are taking the proverbial here, but you are skating on thin ice. In my opinion.
    I clearly stated that it was a commuting expense on the time sheet which they signed off. Plus they should of brought this up as an issue at the beginning and not 4 months later.

    Comment


      #12
      A lot of people who have signed off the work of fiction I tend to submit as a timesheet don't tend to take much notice of what they are signing for. I have a similar term to yours in my contract and I took it to mean that they would pay expenses to places other than the main site where I was to work.

      Yes it's bad that they let it go on for 4 months, but you could easily have asked in month 1 if you were allowed to claim these expenses.
      Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

      I preferred version 1!

      Comment


        #13
        It's NOT in the contract

        As previous posters and also yourself very correctly stated it is NOT in the contract. This will be the evidence produced in a legal dispute.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by AtW View Post

          If you were as brilliant as DimPrawn you'd kick the office door of the owner and leave it in 5 minutes with this problem sorted and a hefty payraise.
          and blow job from his secretary.

          HTH

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
            and blow job from his secretary.

            HTH
            But would she take her teeth out first?
            Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

            I preferred version 1!

            Comment


              #16
              'Just recently... the penny pinching & exploitative owner of the company I am a contractor at noticed the expenses I was claiming and told my agency that he refuses to pay.... even after management had already signed off on it.'

              and herein lies the problem

              contract to noddy SME's and expect these kinds of problems

              lesson for the future avoid noddy SME's and only contract to blue chip clients

              all the best,

              Milan.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
                A lot of people who have signed off the work of fiction I tend to submit as a timesheet don't tend to take much notice of what they are signing for. I have a similar term to yours in my contract and I took it to mean that they would pay expenses to places other than the main site where I was to work.

                Yes it's bad that they let it go on for 4 months, but you could easily have asked in month 1 if you were allowed to claim these expenses.
                That shouldn't be my responsibility... they should be held responsible for what they sign. Based on the contract is clearly states that I can claim expenses that they authorized, which in this case they did.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
                  'Just recently... the penny pinching & exploitative owner of the company I am a contractor at noticed the expenses I was claiming and told my agency that he refuses to pay.... even after management had already signed off on it.'

                  and herein lies the problem

                  contract to noddy SME's and expect these kinds of problems

                  lesson for the future avoid noddy SME's and only contract to blue chip clients

                  all the best,

                  Milan.
                  Yea, I already told myself that I'd never work for a small company like this again.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Xil3 View Post
                    That shouldn't be my responsibility... they should be held responsible for what they sign. Based on the contract is clearly states that I can claim expenses that they authorized, which in this case they did.
                    No it is the responsibility of both of you. You should have asked what expenses were covered and what were not. Most of the coments on here seem to go along with my understanding of that term i.e. they will pay travel expenses if they require you to travel to somewhere other than your main site. From thier perspective it probably looks like you have been pulling a fast one.
                    Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

                    I preferred version 1!

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Blue chips

                      Milan has worked for a lot of blue chips like:
                      McDonalds, KFC, Burger King, Pizza Express

                      PS Only joking!
                      Last edited by Dow Jones; 7 December 2007, 15:50. Reason: add comment

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X