Originally posted by DaveB
View Post
High Court judge Michael Burton's decision follows legal action brought by a father of two last month claiming the director's film contained "serious scientific inaccuracies, political propaganda and sentimental mush.
About global warming of course I have heard that argument many times. It is nothing but a subjective intuition. There is no logic or knowledge supporting it. No one knows anywhere near enough about the the magnitude and history of the universe to give even a plausibility argument for that case. As for the cosmological constant, that is nothing but an artificial scientific construct; you can't base theological arguments on that.
I have no problem with them showing evolution videos or global warming videos as long as they are objective and allow other viewpoints. So, anytime they want to show an evolution video, they have to also show an intelligent design video so that the students can understand that there are other valid viewpoints.

Comment