• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Transport minister wants to lift liquids ban on flights

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by daviejones View Post
    The IRA didn't take bombs on planes though!!!

    I worked at BAA when this happened and it was madness. If the government did nothing and one of those bombs had gone off, we would be slating them for doing nothing...

    Fair enough they might not have fully understood the risk butthey acted and that is better than doing nothing...doing nothing, doesn't save lives...

    And NO, I am NOT a NL supporter...
    Nobody is expecting the government to do nothing. What I wish they would not do the terrorists job for them. Everytime we get something like this the government runs around like a bunch of headless chickens attempting to look like they were doing something. Meanwhile telling us that we need more queues and have to wait this and that and no you cannot take that hairspray onto the plane. All any self respecting terrorist need do is leave his large bomb in the middle of one of those queues and there will be an almighty outrage. So they swap one unlikely scenario for one all too easy to contemplate.

    This government makes no attempt to do risk appraisal on anything to do with this.

    And in fact doing nothing would be better than doing the wrong thing, especially if what you are thinking of doing makes the terrrorists job easier!


    There was no need for this ban, just let the security services do their job.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by zathras View Post

      There was no need for this ban, just let the security services do their job.
      I agree...however they are restricted by the same rules that also make the terrorist job easier.....
      "If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier"

      Comment


        #13
        There is a reason for only allowing that particular size of container - anything litre sized is big enough to create a big enough bang to bring a plane down.

        What there is no justification for is this poxy "one bag rule". It really is a pile of tulipe from BAA to try to keep the queues down whilst they beefed up the number of staff qualified to run the scanners.

        Now they have enough they should relax the rule and go back to one cabin sized bag + laptop bag. They might lose a few less bags in their airports then. Wnakers that they are.
        ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

        Comment


          #14
          100ml of nitroglycerin would do the job just fine...
          "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
            There is a reason for only allowing that particular size of container - anything litre sized is big enough to create a big enough bang to bring a plane down.

            What there is no justification for is this poxy "one bag rule". It really is a pile of tulipe from BAA to try to keep the queues down whilst they beefed up the number of staff qualified to run the scanners.

            Now they have enough they should relax the rule and go back to one cabin sized bag + laptop bag. They might lose a few less bags in their airports then. Wnakers that they are.
            Its a farce all round (as stated above).
            10 friends = 1 litre of liquid. You can buy 1 litre of anything in duty free to get a big enough bottle.
            If they are so concerned about possible dangers why can you buy spirits in duty free. A Glenwhatever bottle makes a pretty good club, once broken it will be a valid knife and the contents are pretty flamable.

            Not only that, if everybody had to check everything in then there would not be that mad scramble for locker space and tossers sitting in row 4 blocking the aisle because they ran on first.
            I am not qualified to give the above advice!

            The original point and click interface by
            Smith and Wesson.

            Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
              There is a reason for only allowing that particular size of container - anything litre sized is big enough to create a big enough bang to bring a plane down.

              What there is no justification for is this poxy "one bag rule". It really is a pile of tulipe from BAA to try to keep the queues down whilst they beefed up the number of staff qualified to run the scanners.

              Now they have enough they should relax the rule and go back to one cabin sized bag + laptop bag. They might lose a few less bags in their airports then. Wnakers that they are.
              The new system being developed for T5 will mean that it is almost impossible to lose a bag in the airport.....

              BAA did an amazing job in getting enough people to man the scanners etc. These people were pulled from non operational jobs such as non urgent IT, admin staff etc....I was working there at the time and people were queuing up to help in the crisis.
              "If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier"

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by daviejones View Post
                You are one boring dull dog, do you know that? Did your mother have any puppies that lived?
                Do not confuse wisdom with being boring and maturity with being dull.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                  Do not confuse wisdom with being boring and maturity with being dull.
                  I am not confused, however you seem to have an opinion of yourself that few others, if any, would share.


                  Surely your wisdom and maturity would stop you from posting inane comments when a post disagrees with your opinions? Apparently not.
                  "If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier"

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by daviejones View Post
                    I am not confused, however you seem to have an opinion of yourself that few others, if any, would share.


                    Surely your wisdom and maturity would stop you from posting inane comments when a post disagrees with your opinions? Apparently not.
                    Oh the irony...

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
                      Oh the irony...
                      I see you have made my point.
                      "If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X