Hurrah! Another dead scrote...

[barely_pointless]

he still picked easy targets, which indicates an ability to assess risk and outcome. Not something you typically find in "nutters"

Now if he was waving a 12 inch jamie oliver chef's knife and running around Camden tube naked and covered in excrement then fine.....

But he was not and it would appear that the jury who took 90 minutes also seem to be as you say.......forensic shrinks...


He made his choices and created his own rules by killing these helpless and unsuspecting people and then when he was made to live up to his rules he did not last very long, did he ?

frankly I'd rather have a beer with a bank robber than be in the same pub as someone like this........... more respect.

[Old Greg]

Conicidence that they were all elderly - even the 2 that survived?

I believe not.

Here is something for all of you jumping to his defence and spouting about justice, illness and saying it was entirely beyond his control: I am glad he is dead. I am happy about it.

We know you are glad and happy. I am glad and happy I have a more rational analysis of this than you.

[Old Greg]

he still picked easy targets, which indicates an ability to assess risk and outcome. Not something you typically find in "nutters"

So you are an expert on 'nutters'. Fantastic. Where did you do your training?

[barely_pointless]

So you are an expert on 'nutters'. Fantastic. Where did you do your training?

here.

[Moose423956]

You seem to believe that his actions are excusable because he was 'ill'. It is a load of rubbish. He picked on the weak and the elderly like only a true coward could.

Seems like we shall have to agree to disagree.

It's a difficult situation. I'm sure the relatives of the people he killed would think he deserved to die, whatever the reason for what he did.

On another day I'd probably agree with you. I guess I'm feeling a bit emotional at the moment.

Sorry about your gran by the way.

[Xenophon]

We know you are glad and happy. I am glad and happy I have a more rational analysis of this than you.

We?

Your opinion is different, OG, but because it is your opinion that does not mean it is more rational.

[DimPrawn]

Old Greg, do you think you could be so analytical and dismissive of blame, fully supportive of these peoples medical needs, if some mentally ill bloke brutally killed all your family one day?

[shaunbhoy]

it's caused by an imbalance of chemicals in the brain

Thankfully this current bout of death he is experiencing has equalised the balance again.

[Old Greg]

here.

LOL - good to get some humour back into the debate

[Old Greg]

We?

Your opinion is different, OG, but because it is your opinion that does not mean it is more rational.

It isn't more rational because it's mine. It's more rational because it looks at the relationship of causes and effects between, illness, healthcare, behaviour, politics and the judicial system, taking into consideration how mental illness manifests itself, how NHS mental health services continue to fail to diagnose and treat people properly, and how these failures can lead to violence in a small minority of schizophrenics.