Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
23 mpg on the daily commute at this time of year, with aircon keeping me nice and cool. That's a mixture of fast country road and crawling in the town centre. More like 30 mpg on a decent run.
In comparison, the Polo I had many moons ago did 23 mpg, and the crap seats gave me a bad back too. No contest.
old greg, with the greatest of respect, you make a major assumption in your loaded question
why don't we separate the arguments...
. would you like a relative to be knocked down ? NO
. if a relative was knocked down what would you prefer them to be knocked down by ? HMMM, probably something which did the least amount of damage like a person dressed as a potato or tomato in a shopping center
. if you had a choice, would you prefer a relative to be knocked down by a, b, c, d, (replace a,b,c,d as you like)
you see greg your question is nonsense
you do agree however, that for my family on the road in a vehicular collision they will be safest in a 4x4
Comment