9/11 Conspiracy

[Paddy]

about the collapse:



http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...agar-0112.html

Makes a lot more sense then a 400m tall building being rigged with explosives.

The only conspiracy that went on was the subsequent cover up of intelligence organisations failing to act or pass on vital information.

And Building Seven had reinforced masonry walls, thicker steel, was not hit by aircraft and yet still collapsed. No explanation.

[Spacecadet]

And Building Seven had reinforced masonry walls, thicker steel, was not hit by aircraft and yet still collapsed. No explanation.

It did catch fire due to secondary impacts from the WTC collapse and the WTC collapse was heavy enough to register on the richter scale

[oraclesmith]

I had a mate who worked in building seven and he said some guy turned up that morning with lots of boxes marked TNT.

[Churchill]

It did catch fire due to secondary impacts from the WTC collapse and the WTC collapse was heavy enough to register on the richter scale

The energy created by the collapse had to go somewhere!

[Spacecadet]

I had a mate who worked in building seven and he said some guy turned up that morning with lots of boxes marked TNT.

Did the van they use have TNT written on the side as well?

[oraclesmith]

...as it happens, yes I think it did.

[cityboy]

Did they also have a black lone ranger mask, a striped shirt and lots of sacks marked SWAG?

[BobShawadiwadi]

My uncles company did much repairs for Port of New York buildings including World Trade Center. He do good job. Very best prices.

[realityhack]

WTC7 collapsed in 6.5 seconds. Get a stopwatch out and go to any video archive. Thats 0.5 seconds more than it would take for a rock or snooker ball to fall from the same height, with nothing in it's way, in a vacuum.

The height of the South Tower was 1362 feet. Freefall from that height, in a vacuum, is 9.2 seconds. The tower fell in 10 seconds.

A building, like a block of concrete, and indeed even the human body, is "mostly air". Most things are if you look at atomic theory. But to suggest that air, caught between each floor of a building, let alone the floors themselves, would not provide resistance to even millions of tonnes of mass above is preposterous.

Consider the Law of Conservation of Energy & the Law of Conservation of Momentum. When one object travels into another, which is at rest, the former experiences decelleration and the latter acelleration. Add gravity into the mix and you have a total time of 110 floors 'pancaking' in 15.5 seconds - and that's as if the floors were hovering in mid-air - with no vertical structure taken into account.

Buildings do not fall at or even close to freefall speed unless the supporting structures are removed smoothly from top to bottom at speed, as in controlled demolition, or all the floors fall at once - a simultaneous series of blasts. Again - as in controlled demolitions.

I believe that a proper investigation into just the 3 buildings' collapse would show there was evidence of explosives used. This is simple physics here after all.

I'm not interested - like I said before - in any of the other theories flying around, or any possible motives. This is the most concrete (excuse the pun) of questions to ask.

[oraclesmith]

WTC7 collapsed in 6.5 seconds. Get a stopwatch out and go to any video archive. Thats 0.5 seconds more than it would take for a rock or snooker ball to fall from the same height, with nothing in it's way, in a vacuum.

So what you're saying is that the bits at the top fell quicker to the ground than if there was nothing under them. Just think about that for a bit.