Originally posted by bobhope
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Technical Documentation - Is there anything worse?
Collapse
X
-
whats the lowest you can do this for? -
Originally posted by MarillionFanWho actually documents their work? I do and good stuff it is to. But god it's boring.
Wish I was more like Milan!
Check Tape
If Tape Full then Change Tape
If Tape Not Full then Wait
Repeat first Step.
MF I've always pictured you as the kind of guy who would just untie his horse and goComment
-
Originally posted by AtWTypical amateurs' mistake is have a loop as produced above by MF where a complete lack of delay will cause that piece of code to hog CPU or other resources: since he is not an old timer he does not really have an excuse that at the time of his youth (years that are long gone for good) computers were not multi-tasking so this crappy piece of code would do just fine, which is probably fair enough for DOS v1.0, but certainly not for modern OSes.
Now below is a better piece of code, but it still lacks key element, what is it?
Code:Check Tape If Tape Full then Change Tape If Tape Not Full then Wait Execute Delay of X Seconds Repeat first Step.
What's this? A coding pissing contest?
FFS!!!
Older and ...well, just older!!Comment
-
Originally posted by MarillionFanWho actually documents their work? I do and good stuff it is to. But god it's boring.Comment
-
Originally posted by zeitghostIt hasn't got a GOTO in it...
An old boss of mine used to freak if I ever used GOTO's!! You'd think I'd planted a bomb or something!!
Oh happy COBOL days...The pope is a tard.Comment
-
Originally posted by SallyAnneOh happy COBOL days...Comment
-
Originally posted by milanbenesless of it Mr Link Detached Mock Tudor Facade UPvc Conservatory Four Bedrooms even though one is on 2metres square Mercedes A Class and old Landrover Discovery... can anyone else add any more ?
Milan.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wendigo100I've heard COBOL is still quite lucrative. Is that true?
I doubt it. Most companies I know of moved to Micro-Focus COBOL years ago (IBM based stuff (drag and drop) instead of the old ICL mainframe stuff).
I've never contracted as a COBOList so I wouldn't know.
I never see any jobs though.The pope is a tard.Comment
-
Originally posted by SallyAnneAn old boss of mine used to freak if I ever used GOTO's!!Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 14 15:46
- What the housing market needs at Autumn Budget 2025 Sep 10 20:58
- Qdos hit by cybersecurity ‘attack’ Sep 10 01:01
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Sep 9 09:53
Comment