Originally posted by Zigenare
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Alabama - WTF!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostWomen don't "get pregnant", they "get impregnated".
WWS. I read a great thought provoking article about "irresponsible ejaculation" - rather than 'blaming' the woman for getting pregnant, turn it round and blame the man for ejaculating irresponsibly. Bottom line, 100% of pregnancies are caused by men.
Men Cause 100% of Unwanted Pregnancies – Can We Talk? – Medium
The creation of most pregnancies are caused by two people, with varying levels of responsibility and culpability on both sides, the general consensus is the decision to end a pregnancy lies solely with the woman. Rightly or wrongly it seems the most sensible approach, won't say it's the best as that is the wrong word, but it is what it is.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostI agree completely with this.
Having a child is not something you should take lightly and is certainly not something that should be forced on someone after a drunken 3 minutes of sweating and grunting.
However, if your significant other decides that she wants to abort your child - for whatever reason, is it reasonable in your opinion that the man has no rights?Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.Comment
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostI think that is a rather simplistic view for a very complex topic of conversation, the edge case will always throw up the case of the woman who stole her husbands sperm, or a woman who stops taking her contraceptive pill / removes her implant without telling her husband or other situations as obscure.Last edited by mudskipper; 15 May 2019, 12:20.Comment
-
Originally posted by fiisch View PostWhat an absolutely ridiculous statement. Of course men have skin in the game - does a father not also have a right to determine the fate of a foetus they have helped conceive?Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostNo. HTHOld Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostNo. HTHComment
-
Originally posted by filthy1980 View Postbut has an obligation to pay for the child if born and raised
Nobody said this world was fair.Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.Comment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostI didn't say making the law, I said making the judgement. It is such minefield that a 1 line law will not be the best answer most of the time. The judgement should be made on a case by case basis, and not with a doctor under threat of being struck off for doing the right thing.
They should advise and the law makers should make the law.
My point is more that a purely male legislature coming out with laws that relate to medical procedures that would never be carried out on them seems to be the wrong way of doing things. Perhaps having a female perspective that is more than a Masonic Lodge's "Raise your glasses to the wives", but actually has input from the gender most affected by it.
You can buy a gun in Alabama, but if you become pregnant after being raped by your father, you must have the child. Any abortion would get the doctor sent to jail for 99 years.
From their religious perspective they are upholding their values that killing an unborn life is an act of murder.
I don't agree with it. I think religion is a nonsense and this is what happens if you allow law to be made on religious grounds. Do I think there is an element of controlling women, yep but that is part and parcel of religion - not necessarily fixed by drafting in more women to vote on it who will probably be religious.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment