Originally posted by Mordac
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
General rant
Collapse
X
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thames_Estuary_Airport"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain -
Seriously?Originally posted by AtW View PostPlus you'll have a seat on HS2.
£170 return "anytime" ticket price right now on fast train from Bham to London.
One hundred and Seventy quid FFS!!!
£250 is first class.
Last journey I took up to Berlin (from München) was about €110 1st class."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
I thought you were in jest - I can actually get you a flight to new york this week for that.Originally posted by AtW View PostPlus you'll have a seat on HS2.
£170 return "anytime" ticket price right now on fast train from Bham to London.
One hundred and Seventy quid FFS!!!
£250 is first class.
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
General rant
Rubbish. Gatwick officially has two runways but only operates using one at a time.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostAs Gatwick can't operate as having two runways they only officially have one.
Same as Heathrow only having two.
It's like counting bridges across the Thames. There are lots of bridges but since some are railway bridges and don't take people on foot they don't count.
The first runway is 08R 26L
The second runway is 08L 27R
The L and R is a clue to the fact Gatwick has two runways.
So stop talking tulip about bridges and listen to someone who knows what they are talking about.Last edited by PurpleGorilla; 13 June 2016, 17:35.Comment
-
Paris "built a new main airport" but at least they had to good sense to keep the old one - Orly.Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
Singapore - the new main airport is still only 15 miles from the main centre.
Munich - can't comment on the old one, but the new one is pretty good, and easy to get to, in about 25 mins from the centre of Munich.
Hong Kong - looked that up on google maps, wouldn't expect to the journey from the new one to downtown in anything less than 4 or 5 hours in reasonably heavy traffic. One road in and out? Serious?
All the others you mention are small beer by comparison, so not even worth researching.
Train ticket to London price? Are you serious? A 60 mile journey to London would cost similar to the existing fare from LHR to London? And why the hell would I lug suitcases up and down platforms and staircases to get on the train? I'd want to get a cab, and for many journeys that could well be be more the flight cost.
Environmental cost - Extremely neutral, probably worse in the estuary. Especially if the new airport was bigger, therefore more env impact. Agree on that one, totally.
London Southend would have to close. Quite bloody right, if any tourist booked a flight to Southend, thinking they were anywhere near London, they would feel mightily pissed off - and rightly so.
Tunnels under the Thames, new rail links, you reckon that's within the £25bn budget? I thinkee notee...Not even f@@king almost...
It all comes down to people, how and where are you going to build an infrastructure that can handle circa 1m people, which is my estimate of how many people would be involved (having lived close to LHR for 16 yrs, and worked for some of the companies involved who would definitely have to move, inc. British Airways).
The more I look at it, the more stupid it looks...Last edited by Mordac; 13 June 2016, 23:17.His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Today 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02

Comment