Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Knives out for George Osborne in Tory backlash
Collapse
X
-
-
-
He is a financial genius! Apparently the sugar tax (on soft drinks) will raise 520 million but will actually cost 1 billion to implement. Obviously not the sharpest tool in the box, must be the lack of a state funded education
**** knows how much the court case could cost, if it comes to pass: Drinks makers consider legal action against sugar tax | Business | The GuardianThe cost of the sugar tax has been revealed in documents published by the Office for Budget Responsibility alongside the budget. The extra cost will come from a predicted rise in accrued interest that the government will have to pay on debt that is linked to the rate of inflation.
The new tax will add 24p a litre to soft drinks with the highest sugar content, a cost that could be passed on to shoppers through higher prices, meaning inflation would rise.
The chancellor has predicted the tax will raise £520m in its first year, far less than the cost of introducing the levy.“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
I'd call BS on that cost figure, £1 bln, really??? All drink makers have to put sugar contents on each bottle, so that's already known, all they need now is increase sell price accordingly for known products and return money to HMRC. £10 mln cost - maybe, £1 bln - total BS.Originally posted by darmstadt View PostHe is a financial genius! Apparently the sugar tax (on soft drinks) will raise 520 million but will actually cost 1 billion to implement. Obviously not the sharpest tool in the box, must be the lack of a state funded education
Legal action will probably be one of those "human rights" based one, can't see how they'd win, but maybe that £1 bln cost figure refers to cost of lawyers
And yes I think that's a very Gidiotic tax.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What did Spring Statement 2026 say about mortgages? Today 07:29
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Yesterday 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Mar 3 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Mar 3 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Mar 2 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21

Comment