• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Muslims' anger as London Olympics clash with Ramadan

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Its date is derived from the lunar calendar so is always earlier than the previous year. Unlike Easter it has no parameter limits.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Mailman
      So why are they being angered now...when we have known the dates of the olympics for a bit now?

      Maybe it was a quiet day on the news front?

      Mailman
      Every day these clowns p1ss me off more and more. That enoch powell was right on the button.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by AtW
        Ramadam does not appear to have fixed dates in Western calendar - it seems to float a lot.

        The phrase western calendar is most appropriate.

        If people want to live in the country, they must accept our laws and integrate.

        I have a number of muslim friends, and they have a right nosh-up after sun-set.

        Another point is that devout muslims have to pray 5 times a day. How have other olympic games handled that - with a minimum of fuss!

        Now, where are those 72 virgils?
        Do you think people who pack the confectionary into boxes at fudge making factories tell people what they do for a living?

        Comment


          #14
          Bit controversial but the Olympics is an event which, in principle, is meant to be free of politcis and religion and all that other bollocks.

          Given that at the last Olympics 25% of the competitors were muslim and they can't eat or drink during daylight hours during Ramadan then maybe they have a case for being a wee bit pissed off, no?

          Finding the reaction here as hysterical as the ones you're condeming, and at least they have an arguement to back thiers ...
          Last edited by snaw; 16 October 2006, 10:53.
          Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith

          Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek

          That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay

          Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - Cyberghoul

          Comment


            #15
            This is a special occasion and they can get dispensation not to do the things they required to do during Ramadan.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by snaw
              Bit controversial but the Olympics is an event which, in principle, is meant to be free of politcis and religion and all that other bollocks.

              Given that at the last Olympics 25% of the competitors were muslim and they can't eat or drink during daylight hours during Ramadan then maybe they have a case for being a wee bit pissed off, no?

              Finding the reaction here as hysterical as the ones you're condeming, and at least they have an arguement to back thiers ...
              Quite right snaw - free of politics and religion, and it's religion that is pissing these mozzies off so I'm not quite sure why you've got any sympathy for their argument.

              Are we shouting from the rooftops at mozzie countries to allow public consumption of alcohol, which is western culture? Are we feck. If a westerner has a problem with that they just don't go there.

              The 2012 olympics had to fit in with more practical considerations, such as the weather and the European footy championships.

              It's easy really, if some mozzies don't like it then don't feckin go. At least it would reduce the risk of another Munich.

              Comment


                #17
                A bit diverse possibly, but didn't the devout Scottish Christian Eric Liddel refuse to race on a Sunday in the Paris 1924 Olympics so pulled out of the race. I'm sure he didn't try and convince the IOC to move the dates around, nor did he go off for a sulk.
                Illegitimus non carborundum est!

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by snaw
                  Bit controversial but the Olympics is an event which, in principle, is meant to be free of politcis and religion and all that other bollocks.

                  Given that at the last Olympics 25% of the competitors were muslim and they can't eat or drink during daylight hours during Ramadan then maybe they have a case for being a wee bit pissed off, no?

                  Finding the reaction here as hysterical as the ones you're condeming, and at least they have an arguement to back thiers ...
                  There have been at least 3 sundays affected by the Olympics since the first one back in the 19whenevers...how come we havent seen headlines about "Christians angered by Sunday sports events"?

                  Mailman

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Didn't the triple jumper Jonathan Edwards or whatever his name was, refuse to participate in major comp because it happened to be on a sunday.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Weltchy
                      Didn't the triple jumper Jonathan Edwards or whatever his name was, refuse to participate in major comp because it happened to be on a sunday.
                      Did they change the event? no.

                      Michael Jones the great All Blacks back row forward also refused to play rugby on Sundays.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X