Dieing and being greeted by Chico...
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Only 5% of drivers who crash were breaking the speed limit
Collapse
X
-
-
" If you contest the speed you have no alternative but to say that you were driving under the limit. Eg if you have a ticket for 35mph in a 30 zone, if will still be fined if you admit you were doing 31mph, it’s daft. You have to lie and say you were doing 29mph to get off"
But surely you could argue that you were doing the speed limit. If the limit is 30, you can do a maximum of 30 - why argue you were doing less. So the guy I know (don't know if he challenged it) could argue that his needle was pointing at 30 and that this indicated to him that he was driving at the correct speed for the road.
Are there any tests for the speedo on the car? The police claim that the cameras get calibrated, but when do the speedos, other than when they are made/fitted.Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyEnglish" If you contest the speed you have no alternative but to say that you were driving under the limit. Eg if you have a ticket for 35mph in a 30 zone, if will still be fined if you admit you were doing 31mph, it’s daft. You have to lie and say you were doing 29mph to get off"
But surely you could argue that you were doing the speed limit. If the limit is 30, you can do a maximum of 30 - why argue you were doing less. So the guy I know (don't know if he challenged it) could argue that his needle was pointing at 30 and that this indicated to him that he was driving at the correct speed for the road.
Are there any tests for the speedo on the car? The police claim that the cameras get calibrated, but when do the speedos, other than when they are made/fitted.
I’ve done many hours of work on the subject for a forthcoming case. The cameras are calibrated by the manufacture every year; but in the factory. They rely on correct installation that often is not done correctly. Eg the lines and sensors in the correct position.
Also there are a number of other factors such as the local authority applying the correct Road Order, putting the CORRECT signs and MAINTAINING them, also the road markings must be correct. I have found about one in four is incorrect. On another subject I have found that about two third of the parking restrictions are invalid. In fact in my home City none of them bar the pay meters are valid. One example is never ending single and double lines without T bars and no notices with the restricted details."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
Originally posted by TonyEnglish" If you contest the speed you have no alternative but to say that you were driving under the limit. Eg if you have a ticket for 35mph in a 30 zone, if will still be fined if you admit you were doing 31mph, it’s daft. You have to lie and say you were doing 29mph to get off"
But surely you could argue that you were doing the speed limit. If the limit is 30, you can do a maximum of 30 - why argue you were doing less. So the guy I know (don't know if he challenged it) could argue that his needle was pointing at 30 and that this indicated to him that he was driving at the correct speed for the road.
Are there any tests for the speedo on the car? The police claim that the cameras get calibrated, but when do the speedos, other than when they are made/fitted.
However, where evidence of a speedometer reading is used in court it is generally necessary to establish it has been recently calibrated in accordance with home office guidelines. These are supposed to be daily (I believe) and entered in the vehicles log - as should the calibration of all the other devices.
A number of cases have been won where calibration has been contested.Comment
-
Originally posted by PaddyAlso there are a number of other factors such as the local authority applying the correct Road Order, putting the CORRECT signs and MAINTAINING them, also the road markings must be correct. I have found about one in four is incorrect. On another subject I have found that about two third of the parking restrictions are invalid. In fact in my home City none of them bar the pay meters are valid. One example is never ending single and double lines without T bars and no notices with the restricted details.Comment
-
No, the point I was making was....
Your speedo says you are doing 30, but the camera flashes you doing say 33.
Has anybody ever fought and won a case when they showed that their only means of gauging their speed was giving them incorrect readings. Are there any routine checks on your speedo accuracy?Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
-
Originally posted by AtWIf you have an accident at speed over 130 kmh (85 mph?) then you are going to be dead...
The worst people on the roads here are East Europeans, cars packed full to the gills with crap, poodling along in the middle lane and then pull over.
I drive up and down the A5 between Frankfurt and Darmstadt which is 4 lanes and is reputed to be the fastest and busiest motorway, especially during rush hour. In the fast lane everyone is doing speeds of over 100mph with only a few meters between each other and nary an accident. The accidents that you do see are in the slower lanes or when someone who can't judge the speed pulls out. I had an accident at around 90 mph, on a motorbike, and I'm still alive.“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyEnglishNo, the point I was making was....
Your speedo says you are doing 30, but the camera flashes you doing say 33.
Has anybody ever fought and won a case when they showed that their only means of gauging their speed was giving them incorrect readings. Are there any routine checks on your speedo accuracy?
However it is possible to get an absolute discharge (having been found guilty).
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/hors180.pdf (page 56)Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bernard CommonHere's a Novel idea, how about staying within the speed limit?“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment