Originally posted by VectraMan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Living Wage
Collapse
X
-
So, we all (hopefully) know how prices work. So what makes you think it would be a race to the bottom? -
Remember the automatic car wash places, the ones that were cheap due to their use of the benefits of technology?Originally posted by VectraMan View PostThere's a depressing lack of robots making our day to day lives easier.
Many of them seem to have closed down to be replaced with lots of blokes with buckets and sponges...Comment
-
It worked even better in times of Dickens when kids were doing their bit for society by mining for coal!Originally posted by minestrone View PostI'm probably against a minimum wage, I think the country generally worked quite well before it was introduced.
Comment
-
Re-open the pits and send down the unemployed!Originally posted by AtW View PostIt worked even better in times of Dickens when kids were doing their bit for society by mining for coal!

Comment
-
Funny thing is the miners fought running battles with the police to keep their hellhole jobs....Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostRe-open the pits and send down the unemployed!
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
That may have something to do with:-Originally posted by SueEllen View PostFunny thing is the miners fought running battles with the police to keep their hellhole jobs....
Mining jobs were well paid.
Mining was a "job for life" they wanted to preserve that.
Allowances for all sorts of stuff were freely available and lucrative.
Paid holidays were good.
The unionisation was very strong (for good historical reasons) and the miners knew that they held a lot of power collectively.
Entire communities revolved around each pit, the miners and their families wanted to protect those.
There were more than a few other reasons.Comment
-
I've got no problem with living or minimum wage. Increasing it a lot might make immigration worse though, by making low paid jobs more attractive to EU citizens. Or not, if it makes work more attractive to British citizens too.Comment
-
Did well for child mortality rates.Originally posted by AtW View PostIt worked even better in times of Dickens when kids were doing their bit for society by mining for coal!

Comment
-
Would you have a problem with it if your son or daughter left school and it was illegal for them to get a job, because the marginal productivity they were able to add was less than £9 per hour?Originally posted by unixman View PostI've got no problem with living or minimum wage. Increasing it a lot might make immigration worse though, by making low paid jobs more attractive to EU citizens. Or not, if it makes work more attractive to British citizens too.Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment